| Literature DB >> 23208467 |
Wei Xu1, Kedan Chu, Huang Li, Yuqin Zhang, Haiyin Zheng, Ruilan Chen, Lidian Chen.
Abstract
An ionic liquids (IL)-based microwave-assisted approach for extraction and determination of flavonoids from Bauhinia championii (Benth.) Benth. was proposed for the first time. Several ILs with different cations and anions and the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) conditions, including sample particle size, extraction time and liquid-solid ratio, were investigated. Two M 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([bmim] Br) solution with 0.80 M HCl was selected as the optimal solvent. Meanwhile the optimized conditions a ratio of liquid to material of 30:1, and the extraction for 10 min at 70 °C. Compared with conventional heat-reflux extraction (CHRE) and the regular MAE, IL-MAE exhibited a higher extraction yield and shorter extraction time (from 1.5 h to 10 min). The optimized extraction samples were analysed by LC-MS/MS. IL extracts of Bauhinia championii (Benth.)Benth consisted mainly of flavonoids, among which myricetin, quercetin and kaempferol, β-sitosterol, triacontane and hexacontane were identified. The study indicated that IL-MAE was an efficient and rapid method with simple sample preparation. LC-MS/MS was also used to determine the chemical composition of the ethyl acetate/MAE extract of Bauhinia championii (Benth.) Benth, and it maybe become a rapid method to determine the composition of new plant extracts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23208467 PMCID: PMC6268180 DOI: 10.3390/molecules171214323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The total ion chromatogram of sample: (1) myricetin; (2) quercetin; (3) kaempferol.
Figure 2Examples of chromatograms of standards and sample: (1) myricetin; (2) quercetin; (3) kaempferol, the inset shows the chromatogram of three standard substances.
ILs’ effects on yields of myricetin, quercetina and kaempferol.
| Solvent | Yield (mean ± SD, mg/g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Myricetin | Quercetin | Kaempferol | |
| [bmim] Br | 0.0497 ± 0.02 | 0.2375 ± 0.02 | 0.0305 ± 0.03 |
| [bmim] Cl | 0.0103 ± 0.01 | 0.1257 ± 0.04 | 0.0211 ± 0.01 |
| [bmim] [PF6] | 0.0163 ± 0.02 | 0.1078 ± 0.01 | 0.0718 ± 0.01 |
| [bmim] [BF4] | 0.0411 ± 0.03 | 0.1065 ± 0.01 | 0.0190 ± 0.02 |
| [bmim] [H2PO4] | 0.0194 ± 0.03 | 0.1035 ± 0.03 | 0.0289 ± 0.02 |
| [bmim]2 [SO4] | 0.0110 ± 0.01 | 0.0953 ± 0.05 | 0.0114 ± 0.04 |
| [bmim] [HSO4] | 0.0200 ± 0.01 | 0.1453 ± 0.05 | 0.0274 ± 0.04 |
| [hmim] Br | 0.0127 ± 0.01 | 0.1329 ± 0.03 | 0.0181 ± 0.03 |
| [emim] Br | 0.0211 ± 0.03 | 0.1556 ± 0.01 | 0.0390 ± 0.02 |
| [HOOCCH2-mim] Cl | 0.0174 ± 0.01 | 0.1375 ± 0.02 | 0.0225 ± 0.01 |
Note: [bmim] is 1-butyl -3-methylimidazolium; [emim] is 1-ethyl -3-methylimidazolium; [hmim] is 1-hexyl -3-methylimidazolium; HOOCCH2-mim is 1- HOOCCH2 -3-methylimidazolium.
Figure 3Effect of [bmim] Br concentrations on flavonoids extraction yields (Particle size: 0.30 to 0.45 mm; S/L ratio: 1:20; HCl: 0.8 mol/L). The range of [bmim] Br concentration was from 1.5 to 3.0 mol/L.
Figure 4Effect of different factors on flavonoid extraction yields. (A) Effect of different particle size on flavonoids extraction yields (extraction time: 10 min; S/L ratio: 1:20; extraction temperature: 70 °C; HCl: 0.8 mol/L). (B) Effect of different time on flavonoids extraction yields (particle size : 0.30 to 0.45 mm; S/L ratio: 1:20; extraction temperature: 70 °C; HCl: 0.8 mol/L). (C) Effect of different S/L ratio on flavonoid extraction yields (extraction time: 10 min; particle size: 0.30 to 0.45 mm; extraction temperature: 70 °C; HCl: 0.8 mol/L). (D) Effect of different extraction temperatures on flavonoid extraction yields (S/L ratio: 1:20; extraction time: 10 min; particle size: 0.30 to 0.45 mm; HCl: 0.8 mol/L).
Figure 5The extraction yields using different extraction methods (extraction time: 10 min; S/L ratio: 1:30; particle size: 0.30 to 0.45 mm; HCl: 0.8 mol/L).
Calibration curves of the proposed method.
| Analytes | Linearities | Correlation coefficients | Calibration range (μg·mL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myricetin | Y = 0.583x − 0.5086 | R2 = 0.9996 | X = 30–110 |
| Quercetin | Y = 0.7856x − 21.681 | R2 = 0.9998 | X = 80–300 |
| Kaempferol | Y = 0.1789x + 53.997 | R2 = 0.9991 | X = 10–110 |
The linearity plotted at 370 nm; y was the peak area; x was analytes; concentration μg·mL−1.
The chromatographic gradient elution conditions of the LC-MS analysis.
| t/min | A | B |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 30 | 70 |
| 1.8 | 10 | 90 |
| 2.5 | 10 | 90 |
| 5.01 | 30 | 70 |