C Hannig1, A Gaeding, S Basche, G Richter, R Helbig, M Hannig. 1. Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. christian.hannig@uniklinikum-dresden.de
Abstract
AIM: The study aimed to investigate the effect of a customary fluoride solution, containing sodium fluoride and amine fluoride, on initial biofilm formation on enamel and dentin in situ compared directly to chlorhexidine. METHODS: Bovine enamel and dentin specimens were mounted on maxillary splints carried by 9 subjects. After 1 min of pellicle formation, rinses with tap water (control), chlorhexidine (meridol med CHX 0.2%, GABA) and a fluoride mouthrinse (elmex, GABA) were performed for 1 min. Subsequently, the slabs were carried for another 8 h. The adherent bacteria were determined by DAPI staining, live-dead staining and determination of colony-forming units after desorption; glucan formation was visualized with concanavalin A. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis of the in situ biofilm layers was conducted, and contact angle measurements were performed. Statistical evaluation was performed by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: In the control group, significantly higher amounts of adherent bacteria were detected on dentin (4.8 × 10(6) ± 5.4 × 10(6) bacteria/cm(2)) than on enamel (1.2 × 10(6) ± 1.5 × 10(6) bacteria/cm(2), DAPI). Chlorhexidine significantly reduced the amount of adherent bacteria (dentin: 2.8 × 10(5) ± 3.4 × 10(5) bacteria/cm(2); enamel: 4.2 × 10(5) ± 8.7 × 10(5) bacteria/cm(2)). Rinses with the fluoride solution also significantly reduced bacterial adherence to dentin (8.1 × 10(5) ± 1.5 × 10(6) bacteria/cm(2)). Fluoride could not be detected by EDX analysis of the biofilms. Fluoride mouthrinsing did not influence the wettability of the pellicle-covered enamel surface. CONCLUSION: In addition to the reduction of demineralization and antibacterial effects, fluorides inhibit initial biofilm formation on dental hard tissues considerably, especially on dentin.
AIM: The study aimed to investigate the effect of a customary fluoride solution, containing sodium fluoride and amine fluoride, on initial biofilm formation on enamel and dentin in situ compared directly to chlorhexidine. METHODS:Bovine enamel and dentin specimens were mounted on maxillary splints carried by 9 subjects. After 1 min of pellicle formation, rinses with tapwater (control), chlorhexidine (meridol med CHX 0.2%, GABA) and a fluoride mouthrinse (elmex, GABA) were performed for 1 min. Subsequently, the slabs were carried for another 8 h. The adherent bacteria were determined by DAPI staining, live-dead staining and determination of colony-forming units after desorption; glucan formation was visualized with concanavalin A. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis of the in situ biofilm layers was conducted, and contact angle measurements were performed. Statistical evaluation was performed by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: In the control group, significantly higher amounts of adherent bacteria were detected on dentin (4.8 × 10(6) ± 5.4 × 10(6) bacteria/cm(2)) than on enamel (1.2 × 10(6) ± 1.5 × 10(6) bacteria/cm(2), DAPI). Chlorhexidine significantly reduced the amount of adherent bacteria (dentin: 2.8 × 10(5) ± 3.4 × 10(5) bacteria/cm(2); enamel: 4.2 × 10(5) ± 8.7 × 10(5) bacteria/cm(2)). Rinses with the fluoride solution also significantly reduced bacterial adherence to dentin (8.1 × 10(5) ± 1.5 × 10(6) bacteria/cm(2)). Fluoride could not be detected by EDX analysis of the biofilms. Fluoride mouthrinsing did not influence the wettability of the pellicle-covered enamel surface. CONCLUSION: In addition to the reduction of demineralization and antibacterial effects, fluorides inhibit initial biofilm formation on dental hard tissues considerably, especially on dentin.
Authors: A Kensche; J Kirsch; S Mintert; F Enders; S Pötschke; S Basche; B König; C Hannig; M Hannig Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Pune N Tawakoli; Thomas R Neu; Mette M Busck; Ute Kuhlicke; Andreas Schramm; Thomas Attin; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Sebastian Schlafer Journal: J Oral Microbiol Date: 2017-07-09 Impact factor: 5.474
Authors: Thaer Abouassi; Christian Hannig; Katja Mahncke; Lamprini Karygianni; Martin Wolkewitz; Elmar Hellwig; Ali Al-Ahmad Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2014-10-10