Literature DB >> 23207042

Positron emission tomography imaging for gastroesophageal junction tumors.

Abraham J Wu1, Karyn A Goodman.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is now widely used in the initial evaluation of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction tumors. It can detect otherwise occult metastases, affecting staging and treatment in a significant proportion of patients. The intensity of PET uptake before treatment has been correlated with outcomes, but it remains uncertain whether PET is an independent prognostic factor for survival. An emerging application for PET is the assessment of response to induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. In particular, PET has the ability to discriminate treatment responders from nonresponders early in the course of induction chemotherapy. This can form the basis for further treatment decisions, such as a change in chemotherapy or the addition of concurrent radiotherapy, and this approach is now being tested in prospective trials. PET after concurrent chemoradiotherapy may also provide information regarding the utility of surgical resection. PET data can affect radiotherapy target definition, which may lead to improved tumor coverage in cases where the true extent of disease is not accurately reflected by computed tomography or endoscopic imaging.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23207042     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies in chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Lloyd; Bryan W Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

2.  18F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mian Xi; Zhongxing Liao; Wayne L Hofstetter; Ritsuko Komaki; Linus Ho; Steven H Lin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Chen-Xi Wu; Zhao-Hui Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Use of positron emission tomography scan response to guide treatment change for locally advanced gastric cancer: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Elizabeth Won; Manish A Shah; Heiko Schöder; Vivian E Strong; Daniel G Coit; Murray F Brennan; David P Kelsen; Yelena Y Janjigian; Laura H Tang; Marinela Capanu; Nabil P Rizk; Peter J Allen; Manjit S Bains; David H Ilson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08

5.  Radiobiological Modeling Based on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Data for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Mariana Guerrero; Shan Tan; Wei Lu
Journal:  J Nucl Med Radiat Ther       Date:  2014

6.  18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography.

Authors:  Corinna Altini; Artor Niccoli Asabella; Alessandra Di Palo; Margherita Fanelli; Cristina Ferrari; Marco Moschetta; Giuseppe Rubini
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Limitations in the use of 18F-FDG PET in the pre-operative staging of gastric cancer: A case series.

Authors:  Ernest Fonocho; Nail Aydin; Srini Reddy; Subhasis Misra
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-26

Review 8.  Update on Neoadjuvant Regimens for Patients with Operable Oesophageal/Gastrooesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas and Squamous Cell Carcinomas.

Authors:  Samantha J Cox; Sean M O'Cathail; Bernadette Coles; Tom Crosby; Somnath Mukherjee
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Positron emission tomography response evaluation from a randomized phase III trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  R K Ramanathan; D Goldstein; R L Korn; F Arena; M Moore; S Siena; L Teixeira; J Tabernero; J-L Van Laethem; H Liu; D McGovern; B Lu; D D Von Hoff
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  The value of GRASP on DCE-MRI for assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yanan Lu; Ling Ma; Jianjun Qin; Zhaoqi Wang; Jia Guo; Yan Zhao; Hongkai Zhang; Xu Yan; Hui Liu; Hailiang Li; Ihab R Kamel; Jinrong Qu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.