Literature DB >> 23206926

Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row computed tomographic angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease using invasive quantitative coronary angiography as reference standard.

Oleg Petcherski1, Tamar Gaspar, David A Halon, Nathan Peled, Ronen Jaffe, Ron Molnar, Basil S Lewis, Ronen Rubinshtein.   

Abstract

We assessed the performance of a new-generation, 256-row computed tomography (CT) scanner for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to invasive quantitative coronary angiography. A total 121 consecutive symptomatic patients without known CAD referred for invasive coronary angiography (age 59 ± 12 years, 37% women) underwent clinically driven 256-row coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) before the invasive procedure. Obstructive CAD (>50% diameter stenosis) was assessed visually on CCTA by 2 independent observers using the 18-segment society of cardiovascular CT model and on invasive angiograms using quantitative coronary angiography (the reference standard). Observers were unaware of the findings from the alternate modality. Nonassessable coronary computed tomographic angiographic segments were considered obstructive for the purpose of analysis. Quantitative coronary angiography demonstrated obstructive CAD in 145 segments in 82 of 121 patients (68%). Overall, 1,677 coronary segments were available for comparative analysis, of which 39 (2.3%) were nonassessable by CCTA, mostly because of heavy calcification. Patient-based and segment-based analysis showed a sensitivity of 100% and 97% (95% confidence interval 95% to 100%) and specificity of 69% (95% confidence interval 55% to 84%) and 97% (confidence interval 96% to 98%), respectively. Four segments with obstructive CAD in 4 patients were not detected by CCTA. All 4 patients had additional coronary obstructions identified by CCTA. The predictive accuracy was 90% (range 85% to 95%) for patient based and 97% (96% to 98%) for segment based analysis. In conclusion, 256-row CCTA showed high sensitivity and high predictive accuracy for detection of obstructive CAD in patients without previously known disease. Although coronary calcification might still interfere with analysis, the rate of nonassessable segments was low.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206926     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  Discrepancies between coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography with focus on culprit lesions which cause future cardiac events.

Authors:  Junghoon Kim; Hyon Joo Kwag; Seung Min Yoo; Jin Young Yoo; In-Ho Chae; Dong-Ju Choi; Min-Jae Park; Mani Vembar; Eun Ju Chun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Diagnosing coronary artery disease with hybrid PET/CT: it takes two to tango.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Pieter G Raijmakers; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Comparison of the efficacy of conventional echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Xiao Zhi Zheng; Bin Yang; Jing Wu
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 0.212

5.  Coronary artery disease in patients with atypical chest pain with and without diabetes mellitus assessed with coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Marije M G Krul; Kjell Bogaard; Remco J J Knol; Albert C van Rossum; Paul Knaapen; Jan H Cornel; Friso M van der Zant
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2014-04-23

Review 6.  Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography for clinical imaging of stable coronary artery disease. Diagnostic classification and risk stratification.

Authors:  Grigorios Korosoglou; Sorin Giusca; Gitsios Gitsioudis; Christian Erbel; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Tomography Angiography and Serial Measurements of Sensitive Cardiac Troponin in Patients With Chest Pain and Intermediate Risk for Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Bruno Biselli; Tatiana C A T Leal; Aline Siqueira Bossa; Maria Cristina César; Sérgio Jallad; Priscila Gherardi Goldstein; Patrícia Oliveira Guimarães; Carlos Vicente Serrano; Cesar Higa Nomura; Débora Nakamura; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Paulo Rogério Soares; Múcio Tavares de Oliveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.667

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.