Literature DB >> 23206790

Tablet telerounding.

Bartosz F Kaczmarek1, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Mani Menon, Craig G Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of remote rounding using commercially available standard tablets with videoconferencing system and assess patient satisfaction.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with at least 2 postoperative days of hospital stay after robotic urologic procedures were included in the study. On the first postoperative day, the physician-patient encounter was performed as telerounding with videoconferencing due to the physician's duties scheduled in another affiliated hospital. On the second day, the personal bedside encounter took place. The tablet we used was an iPad2 (Apple, iOS 5.1; Apple, Cupertino, CA) with a videoconferencing application. A telerounding satisfaction survey was fulfilled by all patients on the touchscreen of the tablet.
RESULTS: Average time of telerounding encounter was 4.5 minutes (range, 1.0-13.5 minutes), average age of the patient was 57.7 years (range, 19-80 years), and 19 were men (59%). Patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with 91% of patients stating that their care was better using telerounding and 97% of patients stating that telerounding should be a regular part of patient care in the hospital. Additionally, 94% of patients stated that they could easily communicate with their doctor over the telerounding system, 84% of patients agreed that they would feel comfortable with telerounding daily if they were hospitalized again and 81% of patients would prefer telerounding communication with their doctor than be directly seen by another doctor.
CONCLUSION: Tablet telerounding using videoconferencing can be a strong supplementing tool in doctor-patient communication. It is convenient for the physician and increases the patient's hospital stay satisfaction.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206790     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

Review 1.  Telemedicine in Surgery: What are the Opportunities and Hurdles to Realising the Potential?

Authors:  Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Ben Challacombe
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Telerounding: A scoping review and implications for future healthcare practice.

Authors:  Andrew C Griggs; Crystal M Fausett; Richard J Simonson; Kimberly N Williams; Tiffany M Bisbey; Elizabeth H Lazzara; Joseph R Keebler; Deborah DiazGranados; Vimal K Mishra; Eric J Thomas; Eduardo Salas
Journal:  Hum Factors Healthc       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Utility of Daily Mobile Tablet Use for Residents on an Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery Inpatient Service.

Authors:  Matthew G Crowson; Russel Kahmke; Marisa Ryan; Richard Scher
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Evaluating the Effectiveness, Efficiency and Safety of Telemedicine for Urological Care in the Male Prisoner Population.

Authors:  Brenton G Sherwood; Yu Han; Kenneth G Nepple; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-01-08

5.  Challenges of Using Instant Communication Technology in the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Yuh-Shin Kuo; Chien-Hsin Lu; Po-Wei Chiu; Hung-Chieh Chang; Yu-Yuan Lin; Shao-Peng Huang; Pei-Yu Wang; Cheng-Jen Chen; I-Chen Lin; Jing-Shia Tang; Ying-Hsin Chang; Ray Hsienho Chang; Chih-Hao Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  The impact of COVID-19 on urology office visits and adoption of telemedicine services.

Authors:  Mohit Butaney; Amarnath Rambhatla
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Telepresence Robots at the Urology and Emergency Department: A Pilot Study Assessing Patients' and Healthcare Workers' Satisfaction.

Authors:  Jens Laigaard; Trine Ungermann Fredskild; Grzegorz Lukasz Fojecki
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2022-03-15

8.  Patient Attitudes Toward Mobile Device Use by Health Care Providers in the Emergency Department: Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Mohamad Alameddine; Hani Tamim; Dima Hadid; Mohamad-Ali Cheaito; Maha Makki; Hadi Maatouk; Eveline Hitti
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.773

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.