Literature DB >> 23206281

Eye movements in pedophiles: automatic and controlled attentional processes while viewing prepubescent stimuli.

Peter Fromberger1, Kirsten Jordan1, Henrike Steinkrauss1, Jakob von Herder1, Georg Stolpmann1, Birgit Kröner-Herwig2, Jürgen Leo Müller1.   

Abstract

Recent theories in sexuality highlight the importance of automatic and controlled attentional processes in viewing sexually relevant stimuli. The model of Spiering and Everaerd (2007) assumes that sexually relevant features of a stimulus are preattentively selected and automatically induce focal attention to these sexually relevant aspects. Whether this assumption proves true for pedophiles is unknown. It is aim of this study to test this assumption empirically for people suffering from pedophilic interests. Twenty-two pedophiles, 8 nonpedophilic forensic controls, and 52 healthy controls simultaneously viewed the picture of a child and the picture of an adult while eye movements were measured. Entry time was assessed as a measure of automatic attentional processes and relative fixation time in order to assess controlled attentional processes. Pedophiles demonstrated significantly shorter entry time to child stimuli than to adult stimuli. The opposite was the case for nonpedophiles, as they showed longer relative fixation time for adult stimuli, and, against all expectations, pedophiles also demonstrated longer relative fixation time for adult stimuli. The results confirmed the hypothesis that pedophiles automatically selected sexually relevant stimuli (children). Contrary to all expectations, this automatic selection did not trigger the focal attention to these sexually relevant pictures. Furthermore, pedophiles were first and longest attracted by faces and pubic regions of children; nonpedophiles were first and longest attracted by faces and breasts of adults. The results demonstrated, for the first time, that the face and pubic region are the most attracting regions in children for pedophiles.
© 2013 American Psychological Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206281     DOI: 10.1037/a0030659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  10 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the Assessment of Sexual Deviance.

Authors:  David Thornton; Gina Ambroziak; Rachel E Kahn; James Mundt
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Assessing Paraphilic Interests Among Women Who Sexually Offend.

Authors:  Katrina N Bouchard; Heather M Moulden; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  [Pedophilia: etiology, diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  P Fromberger; K Jordan; J L Müller
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Virtual Viewing Time: The Relationship between Presence and Sexual Interest in Androphilic and Gynephilic Men.

Authors:  Peter Fromberger; Sabrina Meyer; Christina Kempf; Kirsten Jordan; Jürgen L Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pupillary Response as an Age-Specific Measure of Sexual Interest.

Authors:  Janice Attard-Johnson; Markus Bindemann; Caoilte Ó Ciardha
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-02-08

6.  Gender-Specificity of Initial and Controlled Visual Attention to Sexual Stimuli in Androphilic Women and Gynephilic Men.

Authors:  Samantha J Dawson; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impaired Attentional Control in Pedophiles in a Sexual Distractor Task.

Authors:  Kirsten Jordan; Peter Fromberger; Jakob von Herder; Henrike Steinkrauss; Rebekka Nemetschek; Joachim Witzel; Jürgen L Müller
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Comparing methods for the analysis of pupillary response.

Authors:  Janice Attard-Johnson; Caoilte Ó Ciardha; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02

Review 9.  Are There Any Biomarkers for Pedophilia and Sexual Child Abuse? A Review.

Authors:  Kirsten Jordan; Tamara Sheila Nadine Wild; Peter Fromberger; Isabel Müller; Jürgen Leo Müller
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Changed processing of visual sexual stimuli under GnRH-therapy--a single case study in pedophilia using eye tracking and fMRI.

Authors:  Kirsten Jordan; Peter Fromberger; Helge Laubinger; Peter Dechent; Jürgen L Müller
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.630

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.