Literature DB >> 23205887

Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) in lung transplant recipients: can CMV serostatus guide the duration of prophylaxis?

K E Schoeppler1, D M Lyu, T J Grazia, J T Crossno, K M Vandervest, M R Zamora.   

Abstract

Evidence supports the use of 12 months of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in all at-risk lung transplants; whether cytomegalovirus serostatus can be used to further optimize this duration remains to be determined. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if cytomegalovirus serostatus of both donor and recipient were associated with late-onset cytomegalovirus. The primary outcome was the proportion of lung transplants that developed cytomegalovirus infection or disease during the 180-day period following 6 months of prophylaxis in each at-risk serotype. Two hundred forty-four consecutive lung transplants were evaluated, 131 were included. The proportion of recipients with cytomegalovirus differed significantly between serotypes (20 of 41 [48.8%] D+/R- vs. 19 of 56 [33.9%] D+/R+ vs. 2 of 34 [5.9%] D-/R+; p < 0.001). In a multivariate model, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.004-1.099; p = 0.03) and D+/R- serostatus (OR, 3.83; 95% CI 1.674-8.770; p = 0.002) were associated with cytomegalovirus. Among R+ lung transplants, D- serostatus was associated with the absence of cytomegalovirus (OR, 0.12; 95% CI 0.0263-0.563; p = 0.007). These findings suggest that in the valganciclovir era, cytomegalovirus serostatus of both donor and recipient may identify lung transplants at heightened risk for late-onset cytomegalovirus.
© 2012 American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23205887     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04339.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  6 in total

1.  Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Delayed-onset Cytomegalovirus Disease in a Large Retrospective Cohort of Lung Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Carlos A Q Santos; Daniel C Brennan; Roger D Yusen; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  CMV Immunoglobulins for the Treatment of CMV Infections in Thoracic Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Uwe Schulz; Paolo Solidoro; Veronika Müller; Attila Szabo; Jens Gottlieb; Heinrike Wilkens; Frank Enseleit
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Cytomegalovirus Immunoglobulin After Thoracic Transplantation: An Overview.

Authors:  Paolo Grossi; Paul Mohacsi; Zoltán Szabolcs; Luciano Potena
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Killer Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor 2DS2 (KIR2DS2), KIR2DL2-HLA-C1, and KIR2DL3 as Genetic Markers for Stratifying the Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Dominika Deborska-Materkowska; Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasinska; Anna Sadowska-Jakubowicz; Jolanta Gozdowska; Michał Ciszek; Joanna Pazik; Agata Ostaszewska; Maciej Kosieradzki; Jacek Nowak; Magdalena Durlik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Tailored combined cytomegalovirus management in lung transplantation: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Solidoro; Filippo Patrucco; Daniela Libertucci; Giulia Verri; Francesca Sidoti; Antonio Curtoni; Massimo Boffini; Erika Simonato; Mauro Rinaldi; Rossana Cavallo; Cristina Costa
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

Review 6.  Utility of CMV-Specific Immune Monitoring for the Management of CMV in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Clinical Update.

Authors:  Katya Prakash; Aditya Chandorkar; Kapil K Saharia
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.