Literature DB >> 23205856

Sleep endoscopy with simulation bite for prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome.

Anneclaire V M T Vroegop1, Olivier M Vanderveken, Marijke Dieltjens, Kristien Wouters, Vera Saldien, Marc J Braem, Paul H Van de Heyning.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the value of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) using a custom-made simulation bite in maximal comfortable protrusion (MCP) of the mandible, in the prediction of treatment outcome for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a mandibular advancement device (MAD). Two hundred patients (74% male; age 46 ± 9 years; apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 19 ± 13 h(-1) sleep; body mass index [BMI] 27 ± 4 kg m(-2) ) with sleep-disordered breathing underwent DISE with a simulation bite in MCP. One hundred and thirty-five patients with an established diagnosis of OSA commenced MAD treatment. The associations between the findings during DISE with simulation bite and treatment outcome were evaluated. Treatment response was defined as a reduction in AHI following MAD treatment of ≥ 50% compared to baseline. Overall MAD treatment response in the studied population was 69%. The results of this study demonstrated a statistically significant association between a positive effect of the simulation bite on the upper airway patency during DISE and treatment response with MAD (P < 0.01). The results of this study suggest that the use of a simulation bite in maximal comfortable protrusion (MCP) of the mandible, as used during DISE in patients with OSA, tends to be effective in predicting treatment response of MAD treatment.
© 2012 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23205856     DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  57 in total

1.  Evaluation of the impact of a clinical pathway on the organization of a multidisciplinary dental sleep clinic.

Authors:  D M Ten Berge; M J Braem; A Altenburg; M Dieltjens; P H Van de Heyning; K Vanhaecht; O M Vanderveken
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Reply: Objective measurement of the therapeutic effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  David P White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  European position paper on drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE).

Authors:  Andrea De Vito; Marina Carrasco Llatas; Agnoletti Vanni; Marcello Bosi; Alberto Braghiroli; Aldo Campanini; Nico de Vries; Evert Hamans; Winfried Hohenhorst; Bhik T Kotecha; Joachim Maurer; Filippo Montevecchi; Ottavio Piccin; Giovanni Sorrenti; Olivier M Vanderveken; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Soft palate cephalometric changes with a mandibular advancement device may be associated with polysomnographic improvement in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Hong Joong Kim; Seung-No Hong; Woo Hyun Lee; Jae-Cheul Ahn; Min-Sang Cha; Chae-Seo Rhee; Jeong-Whun Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A Feedback-Controlled Mandibular Positioner Identifies Individuals With Sleep Apnea Who Will Respond to Oral Appliance Therapy.

Authors:  John E Remmers; Zbigniew Topor; Joshua Grosse; Nikola Vranjes; Erin V Mosca; Rollin Brant; Sabina Bruehlmann; Shouresh Charkhandeh; Seyed Abdolali Zareian Jahromi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Performance of Remotely Controlled Mandibular Protrusion Sleep Studies for Prediction of Oral Appliance Treatment Response.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Joachim Ngiam; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Survey of otorhinolaryngologists on their clinical examinations performed in patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Sebastian Plößl; Beatrice Herzog; Alexander Glien; Stefan Plontke; Michael Herzog
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  CPAP pressure for prediction of oral appliance treatment response in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Craig L Phillips; Amanda Davies; Vasanth K Srinivasan; Oyku Dalci; Brendon J Yee; M Ali Darendeliler; Ronald R Grunstein; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 9.  The Use of Remotely Controlled Mandibular Positioner as a Predictive Screening Tool for Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea through Single-Night Progressive Titration of the Mandible: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chloé Kastoer; Marijke Dieltjens; Eline Oorts; Evert Hamans; Marc J Braem; Paul H Van de Heyning; Olivier M Vanderveken
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy as a patient selection tool for implanted upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Olivier M Vanderveken; Joachim T Maurer; Winfried Hohenhorst; Evert Hamans; Ho-Sheng Lin; Anneclaire V Vroegop; Clemens Anders; Nico de Vries; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.