Literature DB >> 23205618

A comparative evaluation of a new automated assay for von Willebrand factor activity.

A S Lawrie1, F Stufano, M T Canciani, I J Mackie, S J Machin, F Peyvandi.   

Abstract

The ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) is the reference method for assessing von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity in the diagnosis of von Willebrand's Disease (VWD). However, the assay suffers from poor reproducibility and sensitivity at low levels of VWF and is labour intensive. We have undertaken an evaluation of a new immunoturbidimetric VWF activity (VWF:Ac) assay (INNOVANCE(®) VWF Ac. Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) relative to an established platelet-based VWF:RCo method. Samples from 50 healthy normal subjects, 80 patients with VWD and 50 samples that exhibited 'HIL' (i.e. Haemolysis, Icterus or Lipaemia) were studied. VWF:Ac, VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag were performed on a CS-analyser (Sysmex UK Ltd, Milton Keynes, UK), all reagents were from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. The VWF:Ac assay, gave low intra- and inter-assay imprecision (over a 31-day period, n = 200 replicate readings) using commercial normal (Mean 96.2 IU dL(-1), CV < 3.0%) and pathological (Mean 36.1 IU dL(-1), CV < 3.5%) control plasmas. The normal and clinical samples exhibited good correlation between VWF:RCo (range 3-753 IU dL(-1)) and VWF:Ac (rs = 0.97, P < 0.0001), with a mean bias of 5.6 IU dL(-1). Ratios of VWF:Ac and VWF:RCo to VWF:Ag in the VWD samples were comparable, although VWF:Ac had a superior lower level of detection to that of VWF:RCo (3% and 5% respectively). A subset (n = 97) of VWD and HIL samples were analysed for VWF:Ac at two different dilutions to assess the effect on relative potency, no significant difference was observed (P = 0.111). The INNOVANCE(®) VWF Ac assay was shown to be reliable and precise.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23205618     DOI: 10.1111/hae.12064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  17 in total

1.  Rapid discrimination of the phenotypic variants of von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Jonathan C Roberts; Patti A Morateck; Pamela A Christopherson; Ke Yan; Raymond G Hoffmann; Joan Cox Gill; Robert R Montgomery
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Laboratory aspects of von Willebrand disease: test repertoire and options for activity assays and genetic analysis.

Authors:  G Castaman; A Hillarp; A Goodeve
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  Establishment of an International Reference Reagent for standardization of von Willebrand factor binding to recombinant glycoprotein Ib (VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR): Official Communication of the SSC.

Authors:  Anthony R Hubbard; Sandra L Haberichter
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 4.  Perils, problems, and progress in laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Veronica H Flood
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 5.  Platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor activity. Nomenclature and methodology: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  I Bodó; J Eikenboom; R Montgomery; J Patzke; R Schneppenheim; J Di Paola
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Comparison of von Willebrand factor platelet-binding activity assays: ELISA overreads type 2B with loss of HMW multimers.

Authors:  Attila Szederjesi; Luciano Baronciani; Ulrich Budde; Giancarlo Castaman; Paola Colpani; Andrew S Lawrie; Yuan Liu; Robert Montgomery; Flora Peyvandi; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Jürgen Patzke; Imre Bodó
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Optimization of the automated, CS-2000i™ method for measuring low levels of von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo).

Authors:  Tomoko Matsumoto; Keiji Nogami; Masahiro Okuda; Midori Shima
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 8.  von Willebrand disease: advances in pathogenetic understanding, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  David Lillicrap
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  New developments in von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Helen Fogarty; Dearbhla Doherty; James S O'Donnell
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  An international collaborative study to compare different von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib binding activity assays: the COMPASS-VWF study.

Authors:  A Szederjesi; L Baronciani; U Budde; G Castaman; A S Lawrie; Y Liu; R Montgomery; F Peyvandi; R Schneppenheim; A Várkonyi; J Patzke; I Bodó
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.