BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly utilized for pancreatic cancer patients to decrease tumor burden in anticipation of later surgical resection. However, infectious complications such as life threatening cholangitis may occur for those with biliary obstruction. We hypothesized that placement of metal rather than plastic stents in such patients results in lower rates of stent-related complications, leading to improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of pancreatic cancer patients treated by the University of Michigan Multidisciplinary Pancreatic Cancer Destination Program between January 2005 and June 2010. Only patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy with one or more biliary stents placed for malignant obstruction were studied. Time to stent complication was compared between metal and plastic stents. The complication rate was estimated as the ratio of complications to total stent exposure time and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: 52 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 113 stents were placed in 52 patients (70 plastic, 43 metal). The complication rate was almost 7 times higher with plastic stents, 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.30), than with metal stents, 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.06). Moreover, the rate of hospitalization for stent-related complications was 3-fold higher in the plastic stent group than the metal stent group. The first quartile estimate of time to stent complication was almost 5 times longer for metal than for plastic stents (44 vs. 200 days) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compelling evidence indicates that self-expanding metal, not plastic stents should be used for malignant biliary obstruction in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly utilized for pancreatic cancerpatients to decrease tumor burden in anticipation of later surgical resection. However, infectious complications such as life threatening cholangitis may occur for those with biliary obstruction. We hypothesized that placement of metal rather than plastic stents in such patients results in lower rates of stent-related complications, leading to improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of pancreatic cancerpatients treated by the University of Michigan Multidisciplinary Pancreatic Cancer Destination Program between January 2005 and June 2010. Only patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy with one or more biliary stents placed for malignant obstruction were studied. Time to stent complication was compared between metal and plastic stents. The complication rate was estimated as the ratio of complications to total stent exposure time and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: 52 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 113 stents were placed in 52 patients (70 plastic, 43 metal). The complication rate was almost 7 times higher with plastic stents, 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.30), than with metal stents, 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.06). Moreover, the rate of hospitalization for stent-related complications was 3-fold higher in the plastic stent group than the metal stent group. The first quartile estimate of time to stent complication was almost 5 times longer for metal than for plastic stents (44 vs. 200 days) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compelling evidence indicates that self-expanding metal, not plastic stents should be used for malignant biliary obstruction in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Pancreatic cancer; bile duct stents; chemotherapy; jaundice
Authors: Chakshu Sharma; Karim M Eltawil; Paul D Renfrew; Mark J Walsh; Michele Molinari Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-02-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: John T Mullen; Jeffrey H Lee; Henry F Gomez; William A Ross; Norio Fukami; Robert A Wolff; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Christopher Lawrence; Douglas A Howell; Donald E Conklin; Andreas M Stefan; Ronald F Martin Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Sonja Gillen; Tibor Schuster; Christian Meyer Zum Büschenfelde; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Douglas B Evans; Gauri R Varadhachary; Christopher H Crane; Charlotte C Sun; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Huamin Wang; Karen R Cleary; Gregg A Staerkel; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Elizabeth A Lano; Linus Ho; Renato Lenzi; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher Decker; John D Christein; Milind A Phadnis; C Mel Wilcox; Shyam Varadarajulu Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Harsha Moole; Amy Jaeger; Micheal Cashman; Fritz H Volmar; Sonu Dhillon; Mathew L Bechtold; Srinivas R Puli Journal: Med J Armed Forces India Date: 2016-10-27
Authors: Loveena Sreedharan; Bhaskar Kumar; Anna Jewell; Paul Banim; Andreas Koulouris; Andrew R Hart Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2018-10-09