Literature DB >> 23204324

Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.

Eric Roche1, Romaine King, Helen M Mohan, Blanaid Gavin, Fiona McNicholas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Payment of research participants helps to increase recruitment for research studies, but can pose ethical dilemmas. Research ethics committees (RECs) have a centrally important role in guiding this practice, but standardisation of the ethical approval process in Ireland is lacking. AIM: Our aim was to examine REC policies, experiences and concerns with respect to the payment of participants in research projects in Ireland.
METHOD: Postal survey of all RECs in Ireland.
RESULTS: Response rate was 62.5% (n=50). 80% of RECs reported not to have any established policy on the payment of research subjects while 20% had refused ethics approval to studies because the investigators proposed to pay research participants. The most commonly cited concerns were the potential for inducement and undermining of voluntary consent.
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability among RECs on the payment of research participants and a lack of clear consensus guidelines on the subject. The development of standardised guidelines on the payment of research subjects may enhance recruitment of research participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethics Committees/Consultation; Policy Guidelines/Inst. Review Boards/Review Cttes.; Research Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23204324     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Recruitment of caregivers into health services research: lessons from a user-centred design study.

Authors:  Myles Leslie; Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani; Gail MacKean
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2019-05-20

3.  Women's reasons for participation in a clinical trial for menstrual pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Susanne Blödt; Claudia M Witt; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.