BACKGROUND: CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) regulates the retention of stem/progenitor cells in the bone marrow (BM), and the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 improves recovery from coronary ligation injury by mobilizing stem/progenitor cells from the BM to the peripheral blood. Thus, we investigated whether AMD3100 also improves recovery from ischemia/reperfusion injury, which more closely mimics myocardial infarction in patients, because blood flow is only temporarily obstructed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mice were treated with single subcutaneous injections of AMD3100 (5 mg/kg) or saline after ischemia/reperfusion injury. Three days later, histological measurements of the ratio of infarct area to area at risk were smaller in AMD3100-treated mice than in mice administered saline, and echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular function were greater in the AMD3100-treated mice at week 4. CXCR4(+) cells were mobilized for just 1 day in both groups, but the mobilization of sca1(+)/flk1(+) cells endured for 7 days in AMD3100-treated mice compared with just 1 day in the saline-treated mice. AMD3100 upregulated BM levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and 2 targets of eNOS signaling, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and soluble Kit ligand. Furthermore, the loss of BM eNOS expression abolished the benefit of AMD3100 on sca1(+)/flk1(+) cell mobilization without altering the mobilization of CXCR4(+) cells, and the cardioprotective effects of AMD3100 were retained in eNOS-knockout mice that had been transplanted with BM from wild-type mice but not in wild-type mice with eNOS-knockout BM. CONCLUSIONS: AMD3100 prolongs BM progenitor mobilization and improves recovery from ischemia/reperfusion injury, and these benefits appear to occur through a previously unidentified link between AMD3100 and BM eNOS expression.
BACKGROUND:CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) regulates the retention of stem/progenitor cells in the bone marrow (BM), and the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 improves recovery from coronary ligation injury by mobilizing stem/progenitor cells from the BM to the peripheral blood. Thus, we investigated whether AMD3100 also improves recovery from ischemia/reperfusion injury, which more closely mimics myocardial infarction in patients, because blood flow is only temporarily obstructed. METHODS AND RESULTS:Mice were treated with single subcutaneous injections of AMD3100 (5 mg/kg) or saline after ischemia/reperfusion injury. Three days later, histological measurements of the ratio of infarct area to area at risk were smaller in AMD3100-treated mice than in mice administered saline, and echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular function were greater in the AMD3100-treated mice at week 4. CXCR4(+) cells were mobilized for just 1 day in both groups, but the mobilization of sca1(+)/flk1(+) cells endured for 7 days in AMD3100-treated mice compared with just 1 day in the saline-treated mice. AMD3100 upregulated BM levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and 2 targets of eNOS signaling, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and soluble Kit ligand. Furthermore, the loss of BM eNOS expression abolished the benefit of AMD3100 on sca1(+)/flk1(+) cell mobilization without altering the mobilization of CXCR4(+) cells, and the cardioprotective effects of AMD3100 were retained in eNOS-knockout mice that had been transplanted with BM from wild-type mice but not in wild-type mice with eNOS-knockout BM. CONCLUSIONS:AMD3100 prolongs BM progenitor mobilization and improves recovery from ischemia/reperfusion injury, and these benefits appear to occur through a previously unidentified link between AMD3100 and BM eNOS expression.
Authors: A Kawamoto; H C Gwon; H Iwaguro; J I Yamaguchi; S Uchida; H Masuda; M Silver; H Ma; M Kearney; J M Isner; T Asahara Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Peled; V Grabovsky; L Habler; J Sandbank; F Arenzana-Seisdedos; I Petit; H Ben-Hur; T Lapidot; R Alon Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: S Shintani; T Murohara; H Ikeda; T Ueno; T Honma; A Katoh; K Sasaki; T Shimada; Y Oike; T Imaizumi Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-06-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C W Hendrix; C Flexner; R T MacFarland; C Giandomenico; E J Fuchs; E Redpath; G Bridger; G W Henson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Beate Heissig; Koichi Hattori; Sergio Dias; Matthias Friedrich; Barbara Ferris; Neil R Hackett; Ronald G Crystal; Peter Besmer; David Lyden; Malcolm A S Moore; Zena Werb; Shahin Rafii Journal: Cell Date: 2002-05-31 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Qing Lin; Russell N Wesson; Hiromichi Maeda; Yongchun Wang; Zhu Cui; Jun O Liu; Andrew M Cameron; Bin Gao; Robert A Montgomery; George M Williams; Zhaoli Sun Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Gregory C Wilson; Christopher M Freeman; Joshua W Kuethe; Ralph C Quillin; Hiroyuki Nojima; Rebecca Schuster; John Blanchard; Michael J Edwards; Charles C Caldwell; Alex B Lentsch Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 4.052