Literature DB >> 23203817

Estimation of covariate effects in generalized linear mixed models with a misspecified distribution of random intercepts and slopes.

John M Neuhaus1, Charles E McCulloch, Ross Boylan.   

Abstract

Generalized linear mixed models with random intercepts and slopes provide useful analyses of clustered and longitudinal data and typically require the specification of the distribution of the random effects. Previous work for models with only random intercepts has shown that misspecifying the shape of this distribution may bias estimates of the intercept, but typically leads to little bias in estimates of covariate effects. Very few papers have examined the effects of misspecifying the joint distribution of random intercepts and slopes. However, simulation results in a recent paper suggest that misspecifying the shape of the random slope distribution can yield severely biased estimates of all model parameters. Using analytic results, simulation studies and fits to example data, this paper examines the bias in parameter estimates due to misspecification of the shape of the joint distribution of random intercepts and slopes. Consistent with results for models with only random intercepts, and contrary to the claims of severe bias in a recent paper, we show that misspecification of the joint distribution typically yields little bias in estimates of covariate effects and is restricted to covariates associated with the misspecified random effects distributions. We also show that misspecification of the distribution of random effects has little effect on confidence interval performance. Coverage rates based on the model-based standard errors from fitted likelihoods were generally quite close to nominal.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23203817     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

1.  Glasgow Coma Scale Score Fluctuations are Inversely Associated With a NIRS-based Index of Cerebral Autoregulation in Acutely Comatose Patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Healy; Andres Zorrilla-Vaca; Wendy Ziai; Marek A Mirski; Charles W Hogue; Romergryko Geocadin; Batya Radzik; Caitlin Palmisano; Lucia Rivera-Lara
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.956

2.  Kinome Profiling Identifies Druggable Targets for Novel Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) Antivirals.

Authors:  Kyle C Arend; Erik M Lenarcic; Heather A Vincent; Naim Rashid; Eric Lazear; Ian M McDonald; Thomas S K Gilbert; Michael P East; Laura E Herring; Gary L Johnson; Lee M Graves; Nathaniel J Moorman
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Two-part models for repeatedly measured ordinal data with "don't know" category.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Eugenia Buta; Meghan Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Multiple Days of Heat Exposure on Firefighters' Work Performance and Physiology.

Authors:  Brianna Larsen; Rod Snow; Grace Vincent; Jacqueline Tran; Alexander Wolkow; Brad Aisbett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of distance between residence and health facilities on non-communicable diseases: An assessment over hypertension and diabetes in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Raaj Kishore Biswas; Enamul Kabir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of national pre-ESRD care program on expenditures and mortality in incident dialysis patients: A population-based study.

Authors:  Ming-Yen Lin; Li-Jen Cheng; Yi-Wen Chiu; Hui-Min Hsieh; Ping-Hsun Wu; Yi-Ting Lin; Shu-Li Wang; Feng-Xuan Jian; Chih Cheng Hsu; Shu-An Yang; Huei-Lan Lee; Shang-Jyh Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  NEBULA is a fast negative binomial mixed model for differential or co-expression analysis of large-scale multi-subject single-cell data.

Authors:  Liang He; Jose Davila-Velderrain; Tomokazu S Sumida; David A Hafler; Manolis Kellis; Alexander M Kulminski
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 8.  Review of methods for handling confounding by cluster and informative cluster size in clustered data.

Authors:  Shaun Seaman; Menelaos Pavlou; Andrew Copas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Adjusting for multiple prognostic factors in the analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Brennan C Kahan; Tim P Morris
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Accounting for centre-effects in multicentre trials with a binary outcome - when, why, and how?

Authors:  Brennan C Kahan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.