Literature DB >> 23203162

Potential impact of amyloid imaging on diagnosis and intended management in patients with progressive cognitive decline.

Michael Grundman1, Michael J Pontecorvo, Stephen P Salloway, P Murali Doraiswamy, Adam S Fleisher, Carl H Sadowsky, Anil K Nair, Andrew Siderowf, Ming Lu, Anupa K Arora, Abigail Agbulos, Matthew L Flitter, Michael J Krautkramer, Khaled Sarsour, Daniel M Skovronsky, Mark A Mintun.   

Abstract

Florbetapir F18 has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for in vivo assessment of amyloid pathology in patients undergoing evaluation for Alzheimer disease (AD). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of amyloid imaging on the diagnoses and management of patients undergoing evaluation for cognitive decline. Patients were recruited to participate at 19 clinical sites. The site physician provided a provisional diagnosis, an estimate of their diagnostic confidence, and their plan for diagnostic evaluation and management both before and after receiving the results from amyloid imaging with florbetapir F18. Analyses compared the frequency of AD and non-AD diagnoses, plans for ancillary testing, and intended patient management before and after florbetapir imaging. A total of 229 patients participated in the trial (113 amyloid positive, 116 amyloid negative). After receiving the results of the florbetapir scan, diagnosis changed in 125/229, or 54.6% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 48.1%-60.9%], of cases, and diagnostic confidence increased by an average of 21.6% (95% CI, 18.3%-24.8%). A total of 199/229 or 86.9% (95% CI, 81.9%-90.7%) of cases had at least 1 change in their management plan. Intended cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine treatment increased by 17.7% (95% CI, 11.8%-25.8%) of all cases with positive scans and decreased by 23.3% (95% CI, 16.5%-31.8%) of all those with negative scans. Among subjects who had not yet undergone a completed work up, planned brain structural imaging (computed tomographic/magnetic resonance imaging) decreased by 24.4% (95% CI, 17.5%-32.8%) and planned neuropsychological testing decreased by 32.8% (95% CI, 25.0%-41.6%). In summary, amyloid imaging results altered physician's diagnostic thinking, intended testing, and management of patients undergoing evaluation for cognitive decline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23203162     DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318279d02a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  47 in total

1.  Cognitive and functional patterns of nondemented subjects with equivocal visual amyloid PET findings.

Authors:  P Payoux; J Delrieu; A Gallini; D Adel; A S Salabert; A Hitzel; C Cantet; M Tafani; D De Verbizier; J Darcourt; Ph Fernandez; J Monteil; I Carrié; T Voisin; S Gillette-Guyonnet; M Pontecorvo; B Vellas; S Andrieu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Impact of Amyloid PET Imaging in the Memory Clinic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yat-Fung Shea; Warren Barker; Maria T Greig-Gusto; David A Loewenstein; Ranjan Duara; Steven T DeKosky
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Quantitation of PET signal as an adjunct to visual interpretation of florbetapir imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Pontecorvo; Anupa K Arora; Marybeth Devine; Ming Lu; Nick Galante; Andrew Siderowf; Catherine Devadanam; Abhinay D Joshi; Stephen L Heun; Brian F Teske; Stephen P Truocchio; Michael Krautkramer; Michael D Devous; Mark A Mintun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Utility of Amyloid PET Scans in the Evaluation of Patients Presenting with Diverse Cognitive Complaints.

Authors:  Yat-Fung Shea; Warren Barker; Maria T Greig-Gusto; David A Loewenstein; Steven T DeKosky; Ranjan Duara
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET imaging cannot replace guidelines: on behalf of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Jan Booij; Javier Arbizu; Jacques Darcourt; Swen Hesse; Flavio Nobili; Pierre Payoux; Sabina Pappatà; Klaus Tatsch; Zuzana Walker; Marco Pagani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Evaluation of 18F-RO-948 PET for Quantitative Assessment of Tau Accumulation in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Hiroto Kuwabara; Robert A Comley; Edilio Borroni; Michael Honer; Kelly Kitmiller; Joshua Roberts; Lorena Gapasin; Anil Mathur; Gregory Klein; Dean F Wong
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  PRECISION MEDICINE - The Golden Gate for Detection, Treatment and Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  H Hampel; S E O'Bryant; J I Castrillo; C Ritchie; K Rojkova; K Broich; N Benda; R Nisticò; R A Frank; B Dubois; V Escott-Price; S Lista
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-09-06

8.  Amyloid imaging for dementia in Canada.

Authors:  Robert Laforce; Mohamed Réda Bensaïdane
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Practical utility of amyloid and FDG-PET in an academic dementia center.

Authors:  Pascual Sánchez-Juan; Pia M Ghosh; Jayne Hagen; Benno Gesierich; Maya Henry; Lea T Grinberg; James P O'Neil; Mustafa Janabi; Eric J Huang; John Q Trojanowski; Harry V Vinters; Marilu Gorno-Tempini; William W Seeley; Adam L Boxer; Howard J Rosen; Joel H Kramer; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  How Accurately Do Patients and Their Care Partners Report Results of Amyloid-β PET Scans for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment?

Authors:  Hailey J James; Courtney Harold Van Houtven; Steven Lippmann; James R Burke; Megan Shepherd-Banigan; Emmanuelle Belanger; Terrie Fox Wetle; Brenda L Plassman
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.