| Literature DB >> 23203096 |
Ali Ghasemzadeh1, Hawa Z E Jaafar, Ehsan Karimi.
Abstract
The effect of foliar application of salicylic acid (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23203096 PMCID: PMC3509612 DOI: 10.3390/ijms131114828
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. ANS, anthocyanidin synthase; AS, aureusidin synthase; C4H, cinnamate-4-hydroxylase; CHR, chalcone reductase; DFR, dihydroflavonol 4-reductase; DMID, 7,2′-dihydroxy,4′-methoxyisoflavanol dehydratase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; F3′H, flavonoid 3′ hydroxylase; F3′5′H, flavonoid 3′5′ hydroxylase; FS1/FS2, flavone synthase; I2′H, isoflavone 2′-hydroxylase; IFR, isoflavone reductase; IFS, isoflavone synthase; IOMT, isoflavone O-methyltransferase; LCR, leucoanthocyanidin reductase; LDOX, leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase OMTO-methyltransferase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; RT, rhamnosyl transferase; UFGT, UDP flavonoid glucosyl transferase; VR, vestitone reductase; STS, stilbene synthase; FLS, flavanol synthase [16].
High performance liquid chromatography analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale) varieties treated with salicylic acid (SA).
| Compounds | Halia Bentong | Halia Bara | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| Control | SA 10−5 | SA 10−3 | Control | SA 10−5 | SA 10−3 | |
| Rutin | 0.893 ± 0.03 b,c | 0.736 ± 0.09 c | 0.79 ± 0.06 c | 1.13 ± 0.12 a | 0.883 ± 0.07 b,c | 0.993 ± 0.07 a,b |
| Apigenin | 0.384 ± 0.049 c | 0.276 ± 0.08 d | 0.305 ± 0.09 d | 0.553 ± 0.06 a | 0.45 ± 0.06 b | 0.55 ± 0.04 a |
| Myricetin | 0.04 ± 0.009 b | 0.088 ± 0.009 a,b | 0.059 ± 0.018 b | 0.06 ± 0.001 b | 0.112 ± 0.004 a | 0.074 ± 0.006 a,b |
| Naringenin | 0.227 ± 0.049 a | 0.29 ± 0.1 a | 0.259 ± 0.045 a | 0.259 ± 0.033 a | 0.303 ± 0.097 a | 0.304 ± 0.02 a |
| Fisetin | ND | 0.237 ± 0.017 c | 0.228 ± 0.03 c | ND | 0.359 ± 0.046 a | 0.304 ± 0.01 b |
| Morien | 0.117 ± 0.02 a,b | 0.173 ± 0.055 a,b | 0.158 ± 0.042 a,b | 0.102 ± 0.042 b | 0.193 ± 0.03 a | 0.182 ± 0.017 a |
| Anthocyanin | ND | 0.381 ± 0.05 b | 0.369 ± 0.053 b | ND | 0.442 ± 0.041 a | 0.426 ± 0.122 a |
All analyses are the mean of triplicate measurements ±standard deviation; Results expressed in mg g−1 DW; Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.; ND: not detected.
Figure 2Chalcone synthase enzyme (CHS) activity in two ginger varieties treated with different concentration of salicylic acid (SA). Error bar represents standard error of means.
Antioxidant activity (FRAP) in two varieties of Zingiber officinale treated with different concentration of salicylic acid (SA).
| Variety | SA (M) | FRAP (μmol Fe (II)/g) |
|---|---|---|
| H. Bentong | 0 | 476.22 + 10.19 e |
| 10−5 | 644.7 + 32.7 c | |
| 10−3 | 521.3 + 27.1 d | |
| 0 | 509.4 + 14.26 d | |
| H. Bara | 10−5 | 793.26 + 33.2 a |
| 10−3 | 716.62 + 32.5 b | |
| Positive controls | BHT | 611.82 + 15.2 |
| α-tocopherol | 887.34 + 29.5 |
All analyses are the mean of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common letter were significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 31,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activities of two varieties of ginger treated with different concentration of SA compared with positive controls (α-tocopherol and BHT). Error bar represents standard error of means.
Figure 4Relationship between anthocyanin and fisetin with DPPH activity in ginger varieties.
Anticancer activities (cell viability) and percent of inhibition of ginger extracts towards MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines as determined by the MTT assay (at concentration 37.5 μg mL−1).
| Variety | SA (M) | MCF-7 | MDA-MB-231 | Inhibition % (MCF-7) | Inhibition % (MDA-MB-231) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H. Bentong | 0 | 54.7 ± 2.17 a | 59.36 ± 2.2 a | 45.3 | 40.64 |
| 10−5 | 41.08 ± 1.56 b | 45.3 ± 1.63 b | 58.92 | 54.7 | |
| 10−3 | 47.44 ± 1.64 b | 48.69 ± 1.77 b | 52.56 | 51.31 | |
| H. Bara | 0 | 51.63 ± 1.92 a | 56.2 ± 2.11 a | 48.37 | 43.8 |
| 10−5 | 38.47 ± 1.15 c | 40.12 ± 1.4 c | 61.53 | 59.88 | |
| 10−3 | 42.28 ± 1.68 b | 47.18 ± 1.58 c | 58.72 | 52.82 | |
|
| |||||
| Positive control | Tamoxifen | 22.56 ± 1.07 | 26.18 ± 1.27 | 77.44 | 73.82 |
All analyses are the mean of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Results expressed in percent of cell viability. Means not sharing a common letter were significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
IC50 values of ginger extracts towards MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines as determined by the MTT assay.
| Variety | SA (M) | MCF-7 | MDA-MB-231 |
|---|---|---|---|
| H. Bentong | 0 | 50.6 ± 1.45 a | 54.7 ± 1.74 a |
| 10−5 | 42.5 ± 1.33 b | 48.8 ± 1.3b c | |
| 10−3 | 44.4 ± 1.72 b | 50.6 ± 1.28 b | |
| H. Bara | 0 | 39.1 ± 1.18 c | 45.2 ± 1.14 d |
| 10−5 | 31.5 ± 1.66 d | 40.6 ± 1.06 f | |
| 10−3 | 33.6 ± 1.2 d | 44.5 ± 1.66 e | |
|
| |||
| Tamoxifen | 17.4 ± 2.16 | 19.5 ± 1.88 | |
All analyses are the mean of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Results expressed in percent of cell viability. Means not sharing a common letter were significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.