| Literature DB >> 23203085 |
Rui Wang1, Ai-Zhen Xiong, Zhong-Qiu Teng, Qi-Wei Yang, Yan-Hong Shi, Li Yang.
Abstract
Metabolomics has been frequently used in pharmacodynamic studies, especially those on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Radix Paeoniae Alba and Radix Paeoniae Rubra are popularly used in TCM, and both have hepatoprotective effects. In this study, a CCl(4)-induced acute liver injury rat model was established and confirmed by the observed serum aminotransferase activities. The metabolomics approach was applied to study the influence of Radix Paeoniae Alba and Radix Paeoniae Rubra on the metabolic changes in rats with acute liver injury. The partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of rat serum and their ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) fingerprints allowed discrimination of controlled, acute liver injury-model rats after administration of the two types of TCMs. The time-dependent PLS-DA plots showed that the changes in the metabolic patterns of the rats, which were administered with the TCMs, had stabilized within 2 h after they received the intraperitoneal CCl(4) injection. The results indicated the protective effect of TCMs against liver injury. Several potential biomarkers were detected and identified, which included creatine, deoxycholic acid, choline, 5-methylenetetrahydrofolate, folic acid, and glycocholic acid. The physiological significance of these metabolic changes was discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23203085 PMCID: PMC3509601 DOI: 10.3390/ijms131114634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Serum activities of alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST).
| Group No. | Dosage | ALT (IU/L) | AST (IU/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| VEH | distilled water for 6 days and olive oil (1 mL/kg) | 85.0 ± 4.9 | 195.1 ± 62.3 |
| CCl4 | distilled water for 6 days and CCl4 (1 mL/kg) | 1200.0 ± 386.2 △△ | 2790.1 ± 936.9 △△ |
| RPR | RPR (12 g/kg) for 6 days and CCl4 (1 mL/kg) | 420.4 ± 93.1 ▲▲ | 1026.8 ± 182.5 ▲▲ |
| RPA | RPA (12 g/kg) for 6 days and CCl4 (1 mL/kg) | 316.4 ± 89.2 ▲▲ | 734.3 ± 206.1 ▲▲ |
significance compared with the VEH group: △p < 0.05, △△p < 0.01;
significance compared with the CCl4 group: ▲p < 0.05, ▲▲p < 0.01;
VEH, olive oil-treated controls; CCl4, CCl4-induced liver injury rat model; RPR, Radix Paeoniae Rubra-treated rats; RPA, Radix Paeoniae Alba- treated rats.
Figure 1Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) scores plot of the olive oil-treated controls (VEH) and the CCl4-induced liver injury rat model (CCl4) group at 24 h after the intraperitoneal injection of CCl4, which was generated by: (A) metabolomic fingerprinting analysis data and (B) bile acid profiling analysis data (▲ VEH group, CCl4 group).
Figure 2Trajectory analysis of (A) the CCl4-induced liver injury rat model group; (B) Radix Paeoniae Rubra (RPR)-treated group, and (C) Radix Paeoniae Alba (RPA)-treated group (▲ 1 h before injection, 0.5 h after injection, 1 h after injection, 2 h after injection, 4 h after injection, and 6 h after injection).
Identification of potential biomarkers.
| Compounds | Change in the RPR group | Change in the RPA group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 269.5 | 4.63 | Inosine | ↑ | ↑ |
| 318.6 | 5.44 | Phytosphingosine | ↓ | — |
| 498.6 | 3.93 | Tauroursodeoxycholic acid | ↑ | ↑ |
| 464.6 | 4.38 | Glycocholic acid | ↑ | ↑ |
| 407.5 | 5.48 | Cholic acid | ↑ | ↑ |
| 391.6 | 5.72 | Deoxycholic acid | ↑ | ↑ |
| 228.5 | 4.11 | 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate | ↓ | ↓ |
| 103.4 | 1.18 | Choline | ↓ | ↓ |
↑ content increased; ↓ content decreased; — content unchanged;
Confirmed with standard compounds.
Serum levels of bile acids (ng/mL, Mean ± SD).
| Bile acids | VEH group | CCl4 group | RPR group | RPA group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 72.9 ± 60.9 | 474.4 ± 299.3 | 621.7 ± 355.5 | 141.8 ± 183.8 |
| DCA | 20.1 ± 10.5 | 15.6 ± 10.9 | 13.8 ± 9.5 | 2.2 ± 4.0 |
| CDCA | 10.4 ± 11.0 | 11.2 ± 9.6 | 17.9 ± 10.6 | 11.1 ± 20.5 |
| UDCA | 1.3 ± 2.7 | 5.8 ± 8.7 | 3.8 ± 3.8 | 3.7 ± 6.0 |
| HDCA | 86.2 ± 51.8 | 112.3 ± 82.5 | 80.9 ± 33.9 | 1.3 ± 2.7 |
| LCA | 73.4 ± 25.9 | 111.2 ± 27.2 | 108.5 ± 34.0 | 81.4 ± 20.1 |
| GCA | 5.7 ± 7.4 | 54.1 ± 52.9 | 72.7 ± 40.1 | 30.0 ± 22.0 |
| GDCA | 6.0 ±4.4 | 7.1 ± 8.9 | 5.4 ± 6.0 | 0.5 ± 1.4 |
| GCDCA | 3.4 ±5.1 | 2.8 ± 5.2 | 2.3 ± 3.4 | 1.8 ± 3.3 |
| GUDCA | - | 1.7 ± 2.8 | 1.6 ± 2.3 | 0.6 ± 1.1 |
| GLCA | 2.0 ± 4.6 | 0.2 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 1.6 | 3.7 ± 8.2 |
| TCA | 4.1 ± 5.2 | 85.9 ± 56.4 | 60.0 ± 38.3 | 59.3 ± 52.7 |
| TDCA | 0.3 ± 0.7 | 3.9 ± 4.6 | 0.8 ± 1.7 | 5.4 ± 5.5 |
| TCDCA | 3.1 ± 2.6 | 9.1 ± 7.5 | 5.2 ± 4.3 | 1.8 ± 3.3 |
| TUDCA | 0.2 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 2.0 | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.9 |
| THDCA | 4.5 ± 8.1 | 22.6 ± 20.5 | 7.5 ± 5.6 | 1.2 ± 2.1 |
CA, cholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; HDCA, hyodeoxycholic acid; LCA, lithocholic acid; GCA, glycocholic acid; GDCA, glycodeoxycholic acid; GCDCA, glycochenodeoxycholic acid; GUDCA, glycoursodeoxycholic acid; TCA, taurocholic acid; TDCA, taurodeoxycholic acid; TCDCA, taurochenodeoxycholic acid; TUDCA, tauroursodeoxycholic acid; THDCA, taurohyodeoxycholic acid.
Compared with the VEH group,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, and
p < 0.001;
-: undetected.
Figure 3PLS-DA scores plot of rat serum samples from all the four groups, which were collected at 24 h after the intraperitoneal injection of CCl4, as generated from the bile acid profiling analysis data (▲ VEH group, RPA group, RPR group, CCl4 group).
Correlation analysis between the serum levels of the bile acids and the activity of the aminotransferases, alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST).
| Bile acid | ALT | AST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| CA | 0.385 | 0.029 | 0.395 | 0.025 |
| DCA | 0.095 | 0.605 | 0.093 | 0.614 |
| CDCA | 0.032 | 0.862 | −0.042 | 0.820 |
| UDCA | 0.408 | 0.021 | 0.414 | 0.019 |
| HDCA | 0.408 | 0.020 | 0.393 | 0.026 |
| LCA | 0.271 | 0.134 | 0.255 | 0.160 |
| GCA | 0.300 | 0.095 | 0.333 | 0.062 |
| GDCA | 0.145 | 0.428 | 0.108 | 0.558 |
| GCDCA | 0.129 | 0.480 | 0.149 | 0.416 |
| GUDCA | 0.218 | 0.230 | 0.242 | 0.182 |
| GLCA | −0.095 | 0.604 | −0.099 | 0.591 |
| TCA | 0.542 | 0.001 | 0.578 | 0.001 |
| TDCA | 0.393 | 0.026 | 0.419 | 0.017 |
| TCDCA | 0.456 | 0.009 | 0.514 | 0.003 |
| TUDCA | 0.654 | 0.000 | 0.643 | 0.000 |
| THDCA | 0.588 | 0.000 | 0.611 | 0.000 |
| TLCA | −0.156 | 0.395 | −0.169 | 0.356 |
CA, cholic acid; DCA, deoxycholic acid; CDCA, chenodeoxycholic acid; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; HDCA, hyodeoxycholic acid; LCA, lithocholic acid; GCA, glycocholic acid; GDCA, glycodeoxycholic acid; GCDCA, glycochenodeoxycholic acid; GUDCA, glycoursodeoxycholic acid; TCA, taurocholic acid; TDCA, taurodeoxycholic acid; TCDCA, taurochenodeoxycholic acid; TUDCA, tauroursodeoxycholic acid; THDCA, taurohyodeoxycholic acid; and TCLA, taurolithocholic acid. r, correlation factor; p, significance of correlation;
significance of correlation,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.