| Literature DB >> 23202820 |
Yaolong Zhao1, Ke Zhang, Yingchun Fu, Hong Zhang.
Abstract
Monitoring land-use/land-cover change (LULCC) and exploring its mechanisms are important processes in the environmental management of a lake watershed. The purpose of this study was to examine the spatiotemporal pattern of LULCC by using multi landscapn>e metrics in the Lake Dianchi watershed, which is located in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of Southwest China. Landsat images from the years 1974, 1988, 1998, and 2008 were analyzed uEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23202820 PMCID: PMC3524601 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9113843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The Dianchi watershed and its location.
Land-use/land-cover classification system of the Dianchi watershed.
| Land-use/Land-cover Types | Description |
|---|---|
| Developed area | Urban area, rural developed area, transportation area, and industrial and mining areas |
| Forest land | Arboreal forest, shrubbery area, and economic forest |
| Wild grassland | Sparse woodland, rangelands in water deficit, and other grasslands |
| Water | Lakes, rivers, reservoirs, and ponds |
| Agricultural land | Irrigated arid land, unirrigated dry land, terraced land, vegetable land, and fruit land |
| Bare land | Bare rock, bare soil, vacant land, and other land that cannot be utilized |
Landscape metrics used in this study.
| Metric | Description | Unit | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| NP: Number of patches | NP equals the number of patches of the corresponding patch type (class). | None | NP ≥ 1, no limit |
| MPS: Mean Patch Size | MPS equals the sum, across all patches in the landscape, of the corresponding patch metric values divided by the total number of patches and 10,000 (to convert into hectares). | Hectares per patch | MPS ≥ 0, no limit |
| ED: Edge Density | ED equals the sum of the lengths (m) of all edge segments in the landscape divided by the total landscape area (m2) multiplied by 10,000 (to convert into hectares). | Meters per hectare | ED ≥ 0, no limit |
| AWMS: Area-Weighted Mean Shape | AWMS equals the sum, across all patches in the landscape, of the corresponding patch metric value multiplied by the proportional abundance of the patch [
| None | AWMS ≥ 1 |
| PAFRAC: Perimeter Area Fractal Dimension | PAFRAC equals 2 divided by the slope of the regression line obtained by regressing the logarithm of the patch area (m2) against the logarithm of the patch perimeter (m). | None | 1 ≤ PAFRAC ≤ 2 |
| CONTAG: Contagion Index | CONTAG measures the overall probability that a cell of a patch type is adjacent to cells of the same type. | Percent | 0 < CONTAG ≤ 100 |
| AI: Aggregation Index | AI equals the number of like adjacencies involving the corresponding class divided by the maximum possible number of like adjacencies involving the corresponding class, which is achieved when the class is maximally clumped into a single, compact patch; multiplied by 100 (to convert into a percentage). | Percent | 0 < CONTAG ≤ 100 |
| LPI: Largest Patch Index | LPI equals the area (m2) of the largest patch of the corresponding patch type divided by the total landscape area (m2) multiplied by 100 (to convert into a percentage);
| Percent | 0 < LPI ≤ 100 |
Figure 2Land-use/Land-cover maps in 1974, 1988, 1998, and 2008.
Structure and changes in land-use/land-cover: 1974, 1988, 1998, and 2008.
| Land-Use/Land-Cover Type | 1974 | 1988 | 1998 | 2008 | Relative Change 1974–2008 (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area (km2) | % | Area (km2) | % | Area (km2) | % | Area (km2) | % | ||
| Developed area | 98.4 | 3.5 | 178.4 | 6.3 | 244.4 | 8.6 | 417.6 | 14.7 | 324.4 |
| Agricultural land | 1,175.8 | 41.5 | 1,151.7 | 40.6 | 1,399.4 | 49.4 | 1,187.6 | 41.9 | 1.0 |
| Forest land | 648.3 | 22.9 | 714.1 | 25.2 | 671.9 | 23.7 | 666.8 | 23.5 | 2.8 |
| Wild grassland | 533.5 | 18.8 | 440.7 | 15.5 | 163.4 | 5.8 | 202.1 | 7.1 | −62.1 |
| Bare land | 46.6 | 1.6 | 40.5 | 1.4 | 48.7 | 1.7 | 50.4 | 1.8 | 8.2 |
| Water | 332.2 | 11.7 | 309.4 | 10.9 | 307.1 | 10.8 | 310.2 | 10.9 | −6.6 |
Transition matrix of land-use/land-cover types from 1974 to 2008 (Unit: km2).
| 1974/2008 | Developed Area | Agricultural Land | Forest Land | Wild Grassland | Water | Bare Land | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developed area | 66.9 | 25.1 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 98.4 |
| Agricultural land | 291.4 | 673.0 | 119.5 | 66.2 | 3.2 | 22.5 | 1,175.8 |
| Forest land | 10.1 | 194.9 | 418.3 | 21.4 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 648.3 |
| Wild grassland | 38.5 | 249.8 | 119.4 | 103.1 | 3.0 | 19.8 | 533.5 |
| Water | 4.6 | 22.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 302.6 | 0.8 | 332.2 |
| Bare land | 6.1 | 22.0 | 6.7 | 8.1 | 0.1 | 3.7 | 46.6 |
| Total | 417.6 | 1,187.6 | 666.8 | 202.1 | 310.2 | 50.4 | 2,834.8 |
Figure 3Dynamic index of land-use/land-cover at the class level.
Figure 4Metrics of land-use/land-cover at the landscape level.
Figure 5Urban sprawl dynamics in the studied time intervals (a) and the transformation of land use types to developed areas from 1974 to 2008 (b).
Figure 6Dynamics of the landscape metrics of developed areas.
Figure 7Transformation into and out of agricultural land from 1974–2008.
Figure 8Dynamics of the landscape metrics of agricultural lands.