| Literature DB >> 23202817 |
Jiri Skladanka1, Vojtech Adam, Ondrej Zitka, Olga Krystofova, Miroslava Beklova, Rene Kizek, Zdenek Havlicek, Petr Slama, Adam Nawrath.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of molds on levels of low molecular mass thiols in grasses. For this purpose, the three grass species Lolium perenne, Festulolium pabulare and Festulolium braunii were cultivated and sampled during four months, from June to September. The same species were also grown under controlled conditions. High-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection was used for quantification of cysteine, reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione, and phytochelatins (PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5). Data were statistically processed and analyzed. Thiols were present in all examined grass species. The effect of fungicide treatments applied under field conditions on the content of the evaluated thiols was shown to be insignificant. Species influenced (p < 0.05) PC3 and GSSG content. F. pabulare, an intergeneric hybrid of drought- and fungi-resistant Festuca arundinacea, was comparable in PC3 content with L. perenne and F. braunii under field conditions. Under controlled conditions, however, F. pabulare had higher (p < 0.05) PC3 content than did L. perenne and F. braunii. Under field conditions, differences between the evaluated species were recorded only in GSSG content, but only sampling in June was significant. F. pabulare had higher (p < 0.05) GSSG content in June than did L. perenne and F. braunii.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23202817 PMCID: PMC3524598 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9113789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1(A) Festulolium pabulare vegetation before the first cutting. (B) Leaf shoots of Festulolium pabulare before the second cutting in untreated plants. (C) Puccinia sp. on leaves of Lolium perenne.
Figure 2Temperature and precipitation at the Vatin research station in 2011.
Level of infection in Lolium perenne, Festulolium pabulare, and Festulolium braunii before and after first fungicide application (on scale of 1 (highest infection) to 9 (lowest infection)).
| Date evaluated |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No fungicide | Fungicide 1 | No fungicide | Fungicide 1 | No fungicide | Fungicide 1 | |
| 31.5.2011 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 7.3 |
| 12.7.2011 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 26.9.2011 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
1 Fungicide was applied on 28 June 2011.
Effect of Species (S) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5, and GSH/GSSG ratio in pots experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4, and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
| Factor | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species (S) | CYS | GSH | GSSG | GSH/GSSG | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
|
| 0.65 | 2.16 | 2.16 | 1.00 | 0.239 | 1.42 | 0.74 | 1.02 |
|
| 1.43 | 3.23 | 0.43 | 7.56 | 0.28 | 3.82 | 0.44 | 0.05 |
|
| 6.27 | 1.71 | 1.78 | 0.96 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.30 | 0.03 |
Effect of Species (S) and Date of sample (D) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5 and GSH/GSSG ratio in field experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
| Factor | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYS | GSH | GSSG | GSH/GSSG | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 2.9 ± 1.6 | 8.3 ± 4.5 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 5.5 ± 2.5 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3a | 0.8 a ± 0.4 |
|
| 6.2 ± 1.7 | 9.0 ± 5.0 | 4.7 ± 1.8 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.3b | 2.8 a ± 1.1 |
|
| 8.2 ± 3.9 | 7.4 ± 2.3 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 1.5 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.2a | 0.3 a ± 0.2 |
|
| ||||||||
| June | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 11.3 ± 3.8 | 3.4 ± 2.4 | 6.2 ± 2.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 1.0 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| August | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 11.0 ± 3.2 | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 1.0 |
| September | 7.6 ± 4.4 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 1.3 |
Average values with superscripts (a,b) are significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Effect of Species (S), Date of sample (D), and Treatment (T) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5 and GSH/GSSG ratio in field experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
| Factor | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYS | GSH | GSSG | GSH/GSSG | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 1.8 ± 0.6 | 7.0 ± 3.5 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 0.7 ± 0.3 a |
|
| 4.8 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 1.4 | 2.6 ± 0.9 b |
|
| 9.7 ± 4.9 | 9.2 ± 3.7 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.2 a |
|
| ||||||||
| August | 6.2 ± 2.9 | 9.8 ± 2.7 | 3.6 ± 0.4a | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 1.1 | 1.2 ± 0.6 |
| September | 4.6 ± 2.4 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 1.9 ± 0.4b | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.7 |
|
| ||||||||
| No fungicide | 5.0 ± 2.3 | 6.6 ± 2.4 | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.7 ± 0.7 |
| Fungicide | 5.8 ± 3.0 | 7.0 ± 2.5 | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 1.1 | 0.7 ± 0.4 |
Average values with superscripts (a,b) are significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 3(A) GSSG content in relation to Date of sample and Species. (B) GSH/GSSG ratio in relation to Date of sample and Species. (C) PC3 content in relation to Species and Treatment. (D) PC3 content in relation to Date of sample and Species.
Relationship between Date of sample (D) and Species (S) and between Species (S) and Treatment (T).
| Factor | CYS | GSH | GSSG | GSH/GSSG | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D × S | 0.9915 | 0.4084 | 0.0393 | 0.0750 | 0.9928 | 0.0005 | 0.8305 | 0.5962 |
| S × T | 0.9835 | 0.9008 | 0.5880 | 0.2044 | 0.5229 | 0.0017 | 0.4169 | 0.5111 |