| Literature DB >> 23202761 |
Kathleen Rebelo de Sousa1, Marília Jesus Batista, Juliana Rocha Gonçalves, Maria da Luz Rosário de Sousa.
Abstract
The quality of the consumed drinking water may affect oral health. For example, the presence of iron in drinking water can cause aesthetic problems related to changes in dental enamel color. This study assessed the prevalence of extrinsic enamel color changes and their relationship with the quality of the water in the town of Caapiranga/AM-Brazil. Three hundred and forty six residents of the urban area were examined, and they also answered a questionnaire on eating habits and self-perceived oral health. As the initial results indicated an insufficient number of observations for the application of variance analysis (one-way ANOVA), the Student t test was chosen to compare levels of iron content in the water coming from two sources. The change in tooth color had a prevalence of 5.78% (20 people). The majority of the population (n = 261, 75.43%) consumed well water. Those who presented extrinsic stains were uncomfortable with the appearance of their teeth (15.09%). We conclude that while there is excess of iron in the water in this region of Brazil, no association between extrinsic stains on the enamel and the level of iron in the water was found. There was a low prevalence of extrinsic stains in Caaparinga, being found only in children and adolescents. In the present study, an association between the presence of stains and the consumption of açai was determined, and those who presented them felt uncomfortable about their aesthetics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23202761 PMCID: PMC3509470 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9103530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Distribution of the number of families, residents and people in the study micro-areas (Caapiranga, AM, Brazil, 2011).
| Districts | Families (n) | Residents (n) | Sample selected (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Downtown 1 | 73 | 305 | 32 |
| 2 | Downtown 2 | 44 | 179 | 20 |
| 3 | Downtown 3 | 60 | 316 | 36 |
| 4 | St. Luzia 1 | 75 | 401 | 29 |
| 5 | St. Raimundo | 67 | 281 | 32 |
| 6 | Countryside áreas | 56 | 231 | 22 |
| 7 | St. Luzia 2 | 81 | 315 | 15 |
| 8 | St. Luzia 3 | 64 | 300 | 34 |
| 9 | St. Antonio 1 | 48 | 204 | 23 |
| 10 | St Antonio 2 | 61 | 278 | 23 |
| 11 | St. Atonio 3 | 47 | 235 | 22 |
| 12 | St Antonio 4 | 68 | 342 | 38 |
| 13 | Novo Horizonte | 40 | 174 | 20 |
| TOTAL | 784 | 3,561 | 346 | |
Number of subjects, mean age and standard deviation according to gender and according to the presence or absence of spots, Caapiranga, AM, Brazil, 2011.
| Gender | Spots | General | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | |||
| n (%) | 169 (94.94%) | 9 (5.06%) | 178 (100.00%) | |
| Female | Mean Age (SD) | 25.42 (18.43) | 8.67 (2.06) | 24.57 (18.33) |
| n (%) | 157 (93.45%) | 11 (6.55%) | 168 (100.00%) | |
| Male | Mean Age (SD) | 24.24 (18.34) | 7.73 (2.61) | 23.15 (18.20) |
| Total | n total (%) | 326 (94.22%) | 20 (5.78%) | 346 (100.00%) |
| Mean Age (SD) | 24.85 (18.37) | 8.15 (2.37) | 23.88 (18.26) | |
Note: Chi square test by gender.
Numbers of subjects according toextrinsicenamelstainoccurrence in accordance withthe source of thewater, Caapiranga, AM, Brazil, 2011.
| Water procedence | Spots | Total (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Well | 241 | 20 | 261 (75.43%) |
| Well and spring water | 6 | 0 | 6 (1.73%) |
| Well and tap water | 44 | 0 | 44 (12.72%) |
| Well and river water | 9 | 0 | 9 (2.61%) |
| Net | 26 | 0 | 26 (7.51%) |
| Total | 326 | 20 | 346 (100.00%) |
Number of samples, average and standard deviation of iron content in water source, Caapiranga, AM, Brazil, 2011.
| Water | Iron content (mg/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | Average | Standard Deviation | |
| Well | 78 | 0.251 | 0.40996 |
| Tap water | 8 | 0.839 | 0.91180 |
| River | 1 | 0.19 (1) | (2) |
| Total | 87 | 0.304597701 | 0.497416125 |
Number (%) of subjects with and without spots in accordance of iron content in water, Caapiranga, AM, Brazil, 2011.
| Iron | Spots | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No (n = 326) | Yes (n = 20) | Total | |
| Up to 0.3 | 239 (93.73%) | 16 (6.27%) | 255 (100.00%) |
| More than 0.3 | 87 (95.60%) | 4 (4.40%) | 91 (100.00%) |
Number and percentage of subjects according to presence or absence of extrinsic enamel stains according to the consumption or not juice, coffee, tea, and açai, Caapiranga, AM, Brazil, 2011.
| Drink | Consumption | Spots | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Total | ||
| Juice | No | 72 (94.74%) | 4 (5.26%) | 76 (100.00%) |
| Yes | 254 (94.07%) | 16 (5.93%) | 270 (100.00%) | |
| Total | 326 | 20 | 346 | |
| Tea | No | 283 (94.65%) | 16 (5.35%) | 299 (100.00%) |
| Yes | 43 (91.49%) | 4 (8.51%) | 47 (100.00%) | |
| Total | 326 | 20 | 346 | |
| Coffee | No | 67 (98.53%) | 1 (1.47%) | 68 (100.00%) |
| Yes | 259 (93.17%) | 19 (6.83%) | 278 (100.00%) | |
| Total | 326 | 20 | 346 | |
| Açai | No | 262 (96.32%) | 272 (100.00%) | |
| Yes | 64 (86.49%) | 74 (100.00%) | ||
| Total | 326 | 20 | 346 | |
Note: different letters in line show statistical difference (p < 0.05).
Numbers of subjects and perceptions of teeth appearance (with and without spots), Caapiranga, AM, Brazil, 2011.
| Spots | Teeth appereance | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not disturbed | Disturbed | ||
| No | 236 (98.33%) | 90 (84.91%) | 326 |
| Yes | 4 (1.67%) a | 16 (15.09%) b | 20 |
| Total | 240 (100.00%) | 106 (100.00%) | 346 |
Note: different letters in line show statistical difference (p ≤ 0.05).