Literature DB >> 23202412

Sample size calculation.

Rajeev Kumar.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23202412      PMCID: PMC3545151          DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.103809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Thanks for writing a nice editorial on the importance of sample size and calculation in medical research.[1] The principle of sample size calculation and formulas to determine adequate sample have been explained for testing the hypothesis for single mean, two means and two proportions.[2] The author has given the definition of important key terms used in the calculation of sample size but left out the distinction between one-tailed and two-tailed situations, which is an important issue: also, standardized difference (generally called effect size) compares two populations, and it is equal to the clinically important difference between the populations divided by the standard deviation (SD) of the population, assuming both the populations SD are equal. In addition, there are many lapses in formulas and their description given by the author. The author has used standardized difference in the solution of Problem B given in the article to calculate the sample size per group for comparing the two population means: however, formula given by the author did not include standardized difference. Correct formulas for comparing the two means assuming a two-tailed situation and similar variance in both populations or pooled variance and for comparing the two proportions are in Table 1.[3-4]
Table 1

Corrected formulas with and without standardized difference

Corrected formulas with and without standardized difference Note: α is the level of significance, β is probability of Type II error and (1-β) is power. For α = 0.05, Zα/2= 1.96, and Zα = 1.645. For β = 0.10, Zβ = 1.28; for β = 0.20, Zα/2 = 0.845 In problems B and C in the article, the author mentioned 90% power but in the description of data the author wrote “the probability of failing to reject a false null hypothesis (β)” as 0.80. It should be 0.10 not 0.80. Similarly, in Problem A, the author wrote 0.80 which should be 0.20. In the description of problems B and C, d is the size of the effect which is simply the difference between two population parameters while in the solutions the author considered d as standardized difference and the value of p1 + p2/2 is not same as This type of articles would certainly provide basic inputs to the researchers and the clinicians.[1-25]
  4 in total

Review 1.  Statistics review 4: sample size calculations.

Authors:  Elise Whitley; Jonathan Ball
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Principles of sample size calculation.

Authors:  Nithya J Gogtay
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Understanding the relevance of sample size calculation.

Authors:  Barun Kumar Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  A simple nomogram for sample size for estimating sensitivity and specificity of medical tests.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar Malhotra; A Indrayan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Harnessing the sustainable competitive advantage of social motivation in the informal market: A West African society insight.

Authors:  Adebanji William Ayeni; Olaleke Ogunnaike; Edidiong Ayeni; Oluwole Iyiola
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-07-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.