Literature DB >> 23201317

Functional recovery of the paretic upper limb after stroke: who regains hand capacity?

Annemieke Houwink1, Rinske H Nijland, Alexander C Geurts, Gert Kwakkel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe recovery of upper limb capacity after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation based on the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS).
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Inpatient department of a rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stroke (N=299) admitted to a specialized stroke rehabilitation center. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Upper limb capacity was assessed at the start and end of the rehabilitation phase with the SULCS (range, 0-10). The following demographic and clinical characteristics were registered: age, sex, side of stroke, stroke type, time since stroke, and length of stay in the rehabilitation center.
RESULTS: On admission, 125 patients had no hand capacity (SULCS score, 0-3), 58 had basic hand capacity (SULCS score, 4-7), and 116 had advanced hand capacity (SULCS score, 8-10). Of the patients without initial hand capacity, 41% regained some hand capacity (SULCS score, ≥4) at discharge. Of these, patients with SULCS scores of 2 and 3 had 29 and 97 times greater chance of regaining some hand capacity compared with patients with an initial SULCS score of 0, respectively. Of the patients with initial basic hand capacity, 78% regained advanced hand capacity at discharge. The SULCS score on admission explained 51% of the SULCS score variance at discharge, while time since stroke was negatively associated with upper limb recovery, explaining an additional 7% of the SULCS score variance at discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: Even patients with minimal proximal shoulder and elbow control of the upper paretic limb on admission in a rehabilitation center have a fair chance of regaining some hand capacity in the long-term after stroke, whereas patients without such proximal arm control have a much poorer prognosis for regaining hand capacity.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23201317     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  16 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of Walking and Arm Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Li Khim Kwah; Robert D Herbert
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-11-02

Review 2.  Are we armed with the right data? Pooled individual data review of biomarkers in people with severe upper limb impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Kathryn S Hayward; Julia Schmidt; Keith R Lohse; Sue Peters; Julie Bernhardt; Natasha A Lannin; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  Arm rehabilitation in post stroke subjects: A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of myoelectrically driven FES applied in a task-oriented approach.

Authors:  Johanna Jonsdottir; Rune Thorsen; Irene Aprile; Silvia Galeri; Giovanna Spannocchi; Ettore Beghi; Elisa Bianchi; Angelo Montesano; Maurizio Ferrarin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing upper limb function: transcultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale.

Authors:  João Paulo Branco; Sandra Oliveira; João Páscoa Pinheiro; Pedro L Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-03

5.  Repetitive reaching training combined with transcranial Random Noise Stimulation in stroke survivors with chronic and severe arm paresis is feasible: a pilot, triple-blind, randomised case series.

Authors:  Kathryn S Hayward; Sandra G Brauer; Kathy L Ruddy; David Lloyd; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface Coupled to a Robotic Hand Orthosis Aimed for Neurorehabilitation of Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Jessica Cantillo-Negrete; Ruben I Carino-Escobar; Paul Carrillo-Mora; David Elias-Vinas; Josefina Gutierrez-Martinez
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  Single limb cable driven wearable robotic device for upper extremity movement support after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Zahra Kadivar; Christopher E Beck; Roger N Rovekamp; Marcia K O'Malley
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2021-06-02

8.  Residual Upper Arm Motor Function Primes Innervation of Paretic Forearm Muscles in Chronic Stroke after Brain-Machine Interface (BMI) Training.

Authors:  Marco Rocha Curado; Eliana Garcia Cossio; Doris Broetz; Manuel Agostini; Woosang Cho; Fabricio Lima Brasil; Oezge Yilmaz; Giulia Liberati; Guilherme Lepski; Niels Birbaumer; Ander Ramos-Murguialday
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of upper extremity neurorehabilitation using technology: a European Delphi consensus study within the EU COST Action Network on Robotics for Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Hughes; Sofia Barbosa Bouças; Jane H Burridge; Margit Alt Murphy; Jaap Buurke; Peter Feys; Verena Klamroth-Marganska; Ilse Lamers; Gerdienke Prange-Lasonder; Annick Timmermans; Thierry Keller
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Using the TIDieR Checklist to Standardize the Description of a Functional Strength Training Intervention for the Upper Limb After Stroke.

Authors:  Paulette van Vliet; Susan M Hunter; Catherine Donaldson; Valerie Pomeroy
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.