OBJECTIVE: To build on Achenbach, Rescorla, and Ivanova (2012) by (a) reporting new international findings for parent, teacher, and self-ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist, Youth Self-Report, and Teacher's Report Form; (b) testing the fit of syndrome models to new data from 17 societies, including previously underrepresented regions; (c) testing effects of society, gender, and age in 44 societies by integrating new and previous data; (d) testing cross-society correlations between mean item ratings; (e) describing the construction of multisociety norms; (f) illustrating clinical applications. METHOD: Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of parent, teacher, and self-ratings, performed separately for each society; tests of societal, gender, and age effects on dimensional syndrome scales, DSM-oriented scales, Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems scales; tests of agreement between low, medium, and high ratings of problem items across societies. RESULTS: CFAs supported the tested syndrome models in all societies according to the primary fit index (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA]), but less consistently according to other indices; effect sizes were small-to-medium for societal differences in scale scores, but very small for gender, age, and interactions with society; items received similarly low, medium, or high ratings in different societies; problem scores from 44 societies fit three sets of multisociety norms. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically derived syndrome models fit parent, teacher, and self-ratings when tested individually in all 44 societies according to RMSEAs (but less consistently according to other indices). Small to medium differences in scale scores among societies supported the use of low-, medium-, and high-scoring norms in clinical assessment of individual children.
OBJECTIVE: To build on Achenbach, Rescorla, and Ivanova (2012) by (a) reporting new international findings for parent, teacher, and self-ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist, Youth Self-Report, and Teacher's Report Form; (b) testing the fit of syndrome models to new data from 17 societies, including previously underrepresented regions; (c) testing effects of society, gender, and age in 44 societies by integrating new and previous data; (d) testing cross-society correlations between mean item ratings; (e) describing the construction of multisociety norms; (f) illustrating clinical applications. METHOD: Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of parent, teacher, and self-ratings, performed separately for each society; tests of societal, gender, and age effects on dimensional syndrome scales, DSM-oriented scales, Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems scales; tests of agreement between low, medium, and high ratings of problem items across societies. RESULTS: CFAs supported the tested syndrome models in all societies according to the primary fit index (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA]), but less consistently according to other indices; effect sizes were small-to-medium for societal differences in scale scores, but very small for gender, age, and interactions with society; items received similarly low, medium, or high ratings in different societies; problem scores from 44 societies fit three sets of multisociety norms. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically derived syndrome models fit parent, teacher, and self-ratings when tested individually in all 44 societies according to RMSEAs (but less consistently according to other indices). Small to medium differences in scale scores among societies supported the use of low-, medium-, and high-scoring norms in clinical assessment of individual children.
Authors: Christy A Denckla; David M Ndetei; Victoria N Mutiso; Christine W Musyimi; Abednego M Musau; Eric S Nandoya; Kelly K Anderson; Snezana Milanovic; David Henderson; Kwame McKenzie Journal: J Child Adolesc Ment Health Date: 2017-04-12
Authors: Bruce E Compas; Sarah S Jaser; Alexandra H Bettis; Kelly H Watson; Meredith A Gruhn; Jennifer P Dunbar; Ellen Williams; Jennifer C Thigpen Journal: Psychol Bull Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 17.737
Authors: W Andrew Rothenberg; Jennifer E Lansford; Marc H Bornstein; Lei Chang; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Laura Di Giunta; Kenneth A Dodge; Patrick S Malone; Paul Oburu; Concetta Pastorelli; Ann T Skinner; Emma Sorbring; Laurence Steinberg; Sombat Tapanya; Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado; Saengduean Yotanyamaneewong; Liane Peña Alampay; Suha M Al-Hassan; Dario Bacchini Journal: J Res Adolesc Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: D Stevanovic; R Urbán; O Atilola; P Vostanis; Y P Singh Balhara; M Avicenna; H Kandemir; R Knez; T Franic; P Petrov Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Joseph Murray; Yulia Shenderovich; Frances Gardner; Christopher Mikton; James H Derzon; Jianghong Liu; Manuel Eisner Journal: Crime Justice Date: 2018-03-26
Authors: Masha Y Ivanova; Thomas M Achenbach; Leslie A Rescorla; Lori V Tumer; Adelina Ahmeti-Pronaj; Alma Au; Carmen Avila Maese; Monica Bellina; J Carlos Caldas; Yi-Chuen Chen; Ladislav Csemy; Marina M da Rocha; Jeroen Decoster; Anca Dobrean; Lourdes Ezpeleta; Johnny R J Fontaine; Yasuko Funabiki; Halldór S Guðmundsson; Valerie S Harder; Marie Leiner de la Cabada; Patrick Leung; Jianghong Liu; Safia Mahr; Sergey Malykh; Jelena Srdanovic Maras; Jasminka Markovic; David M Ndetei; Kyung Ja Oh; Jean-Michel Petot; Geylan Riad; Direnc Sakarya; Virginia C Samaniego; Sandra Sebre; Mimoza Shahini; Edwiges Silvares; Roma Simulioniene; Elvisa Sokoli; Joel B Talcott; Natalia Vazquez; Ewa Zasepa Journal: J Psychopathol Behav Assess Date: 2014-08-08