| Literature DB >> 23200211 |
Alexandra Nolting1, Matthias Perleth, Gero Langer, Joerg J Meerpohl, Gerald Gartlehner, Angela Kaminski-Hartenthaler, Holger J Schünemann.
Abstract
In the GRADE approach, randomized trials are classified as high quality evidence and observational studies as low quality evidence but both can be rated down if a body of evidence is associated with a high risk of publication bias. Even when individual studies included in best-evidence summaries have a low risk of bias, publication bias can result in substantial overestimates of effect. Authors should suspect publication bias when available evidence comes from a number of small studies most of which have been commercially funded. A number of approaches based on examination of the pattern of data are available to help assess publication bias. The most popular of these is the funnel plot; all, however, have substantial limitations. Publication bias is likely frequent, and caution in the face of early results, particularly with small sample size and number of events, is warranted.Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23200211 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.10.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ISSN: 1865-9217