Literature DB >> 23200196

Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review.

A Bouquet1, J Juga.   

Abstract

Extensive genetic progress has been achieved in dairy cattle populations on many traits of economic importance because of efficient breeding programmes. Success of these programmes has relied on progeny testing of the best young males to accurately assess their genetic merit and hence their potential for breeding. Over the last few years, the integration of dense genomic information into statistical tools used to make selection decisions, commonly referred to as genomic selection, has enabled gains in predicting accuracy of breeding values for young animals without own performance. The possibility to select animals at an early stage allows defining new breeding strategies aimed at boosting genetic progress while reducing costs. The first objective of this article was to review methods used to model and optimize breeding schemes integrating genomic selection and to discuss their relative advantages and limitations. The second objective was to summarize the main results and perspectives on the use of genomic selection in practical breeding schemes, on the basis of the example of dairy cattle populations. Two main designs of breeding programmes integrating genomic selection were studied in dairy cattle. Genomic selection can be used either for pre-selecting males to be progeny tested or for selecting males to be used as active sires in the population. The first option produces moderate genetic gains without changing the structure of breeding programmes. The second option leads to large genetic gains, up to double those of conventional schemes because of a major reduction in the mean generation interval, but it requires greater changes in breeding programme structure. The literature suggests that genomic selection becomes more attractive when it is coupled with embryo transfer technologies to further increase selection intensity on the dam-to-sire pathway. The use of genomic information also offers new opportunities to improve preservation of genetic variation. However, recent simulation studies have shown that putting constraints on genomic inbreeding rates for defining optimal contributions of breeding animals could significantly reduce achievable genetic gain. Finally, the article summarizes the potential of genomic selection to include new traits in the breeding goal to meet societal demands regarding animal health and environmental efficiency in animal production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23200196     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112002248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  11 in total

1.  Estimation of genetic parameters of growth traits for direct and maternal effects in Murrah buffalo.

Authors:  Pooja Joshi; G R Gowane; Rani Alex; I D Gupta; Destaw Worku; Linda George; Ashish Ranjan; Archana Verma
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 1.893

2.  Long-term genomic selection for heterosis without dominance in multiplicative traits: case study of bunch production in oil palm.

Authors:  David Cros; Marie Denis; Jean-Marc Bouvet; Leopoldo Sánchez
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.

Authors:  Ning Gao; Jiaqi Li; Jinlong He; Guang Xiao; Yuanyu Luo; Hao Zhang; Zanmou Chen; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Genomic selection needs to be carefully assessed to meet specific requirements in livestock breeding programs.

Authors:  Elisabeth Jonas; Dirk-Jan de Koning
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations.

Authors:  William M Muir; Heng-Wei Cheng; Candace Croney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Use of Genomic Tools to Improve Cattle Health in the Context of Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Mikolaj M Raszek; Le L Guan; Graham S Plastow
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Balancing selection on a recessive lethal deletion with pleiotropic effects on two neighboring genes in the porcine genome.

Authors:  Martijn F L Derks; Marcos S Lopes; Mirte Bosse; Ole Madsen; Bert Dibbits; Barbara Harlizius; Martien A M Groenen; Hendrik-Jan Megens
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Epigenetic marks: regulators of livestock phenotypes and conceivable sources of missing variation in livestock improvement programs.

Authors:  Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  High density genome wide genotyping-by-sequencing and association identifies common and low frequency SNPs, and novel candidate genes influencing cow milk traits.

Authors:  Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu; Sunday O Peters; Kingsley A Akwanji; Ikhide G Imumorin; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Expression profiles of the MXD3 gene and association of sequence variants with growth traits in Xianan and Qinchuan cattle.

Authors:  Dan Hao; Bo Thomsen; Jiangsong Bai; Shujun Peng; Xianyong Lan; Yongzhen Huang; Xiao Wang; Hong Chen
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.