Literature DB >> 23200016

Comparative characterization of the cellular uptake and photodynamic efficiency of Foscan® and Fospeg in a human prostate cancer cell line.

Aspasia Petri1, Dido Yova, Eleni Alexandratou, Maria Kyriazi, Michail Rallis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: m-THPC (Foscan(®)) is one of the most potent second generation photosensitizers used in photodynamic therapy, photoactivated at higher wavelengths (652 nm). However, its strongly hydrophobic nature causes aggregation of the molecules and prevents its unbiased bioavailability in the biological media, resulting in lower accumulation in the tumor cells. Several strategies have been adopted to improve the photodynamic characteristics of the photosensitizer. Among them, very promising seems to be the encapsulation of the molecule into liposomes, due to the superior properties of liposomes as drug carriers.
METHODS: In this paper the photodynamic characteristics of the PEGylated liposomal formulation of m-THPC, Fospeg, using the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, as an in vitro model, were investigated. In addition the spectral characteristics, cellular uptake and localization, dark and light induced cytotoxicity and photodynamic efficacy of Foscan(®) and Fospeg were compared.
RESULTS: Fospeg, compared with Foscan, showed higher intracellular uptake at any concentration and incubation time. Regarding PDT efficacy, Fospeg produced more severe cytotoxicity than Foscan(®) at any concentration and energy dose. Using Fospeg, the lowest concentration (0.22 μM) and energy dose (180 mJ/cm(2)) was adequate to result in the death of 50% of the cells 24h post PDT while an approximately 10 times higher Foscan(®) concentration (1.8 μM) was needed to result in the same cytotoxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PEGylated liposomal formulation of m-THPC resulted in the improvement of its intracellular uptake and the enhancement of its photodynamic activity. Fospeg, compared to Foscan(®), proved to be a more advantageous photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23200016     DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2012.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther        ISSN: 1572-1000            Impact factor:   3.631


  5 in total

Review 1.  Implications of photodynamic cancer therapy: an overview of PDT mechanisms basically and practically.

Authors:  Nafiseh Sobhani; Ali Akbar Samadani
Journal:  J Egypt Natl Canc Inst       Date:  2021-11-15

2.  Self-assembled liposomal nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Magesh Sadasivam; Pinar Avci; Gaurav K Gupta; Shanmugamurthy Lakshmanan; Rakkiyappan Chandran; Ying-Ying Huang; Raj Kumar; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Eur J Nanomed       Date:  2013-07

3.  Mechanisms of growth inhibition of primary prostate epithelial cells following gamma irradiation or photodynamic therapy include senescence, necrosis, and autophagy, but not apoptosis.

Authors:  Fiona M Frame; Huguette Savoie; Francesca Bryden; Francesca Giuntini; Vincent M Mann; Matthew S Simms; Ross W Boyle; Norman J Maitland
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Porphyrin photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy and its applications.

Authors:  Jiayuan Kou; Dou Dou; Liming Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-11

Review 5.  Photosensitizers in prostate cancer therapy.

Authors:  Taher Gheewala; Troy Skwor; Gnanasekar Munirathinam
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.