Literature DB >> 23199880

Tracking the elusive monophyly of nototheniid fishes (Teleostei) with multiple mitochondrial and nuclear markers.

A Dettai1, M Berkani, A-C Lautredou, A Couloux, G Lecointre, C Ozouf-Costaz, C Gallut.   

Abstract

Since the first molecular study of the suborder Notothenioidei in 1994, many phylogenetic studies have been published. Among these, those with a sufficient number of taxa have all suggested that the Nototheniidae, as currently defined, is monophyletic only with the inclusion of the Channichthyidae, Artedidraconidae, Bathydraconidae and Harpagiferidae. This is corroborated by more recent studies including more taxa, but in these studies either the number of nuclear markers or the number of taxa included remained low. We obtained sequences for a large sampling covering most nototheniid genera for five markers described previously for other samplings (COI, Rhodopsin retrogene, Pkd1, HECW2, and SSRP1) and one nuclear marker never used before in phylogenetic inference (PPM1d). The topology for the combined analysis of the nuclear coding genes, as well as the topology for SSRP1 (non-coding) and the combined analysis for all markers all support the paraphyly of Nototheniidae, the genus Notothenia (including Paranotothenia) is the sister group of the clade Channichthyidae, Artedidraconidae, Bathydraconidae and Harpagiferidae, and genus Gobionotothen is a sister group to both. As in previous studies, Trematomus, Lepidonotothen and Patagonotothen form a clade that also includes Indonotothenia cyanobrancha. The position of Pleuragramma antarctica, Dissostichus species and Aethotaxis mitopteryx remains unstable and dependant on markers and analyses. We therefore propose the inclusion of the four families of the High Antarctic clade in the Nototheniidae, and their transformation into subfamilies. We transfer Paranotothenia magellanica to the genus Notothenia, as Notothenia magellanica.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23199880     DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2012.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Genomics        ISSN: 1874-7787            Impact factor:   1.710


  11 in total

1.  Identification of the notothenioid sister lineage illuminates the biogeographic history of an Antarctic adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Thomas J Near; Alex Dornburg; Richard C Harrington; Claudio Oliveira; Theodore W Pietsch; Christine E Thacker; Takashi P Satoh; Eri Katayama; Peter C Wainwright; Joseph T Eastman; Jeremy M Beaulieu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Contrasting morphology with molecular data: an approach to revision of species complexes based on the example of European Phoxinus (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  Anja Palandačić; Alexander Naseka; David Ramler; Harald Ahnelt
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Mobilization of retrotransposons as a cause of chromosomal diversification and rapid speciation: the case for the Antarctic teleost genus Trematomus.

Authors:  J Auvinet; P Graça; L Belkadi; L Petit; E Bonnivard; A Dettaï; W H Detrich; C Ozouf-Costaz; D Higuet
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Insertion Hot Spots of DIRS1 Retrotransposon and Chromosomal Diversifications among the Antarctic Teleosts Nototheniidae.

Authors:  Juliette Auvinet; Paula Graça; Laura Ghigliotti; Eva Pisano; Agnès Dettaï; Catherine Ozouf-Costaz; Dominique Higuet
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Phylogenomics of an extra-Antarctic notothenioid radiation reveals a previously unrecognized lineage and diffuse species boundaries.

Authors:  Santiago G Ceballos; Marius Roesti; Michael Matschiner; Daniel A Fernández; Malte Damerau; Reinhold Hanel; Walter Salzburger
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Diversity and disparity through time in the adaptive radiation of Antarctic notothenioid fishes.

Authors:  M Colombo; M Damerau; R Hanel; W Salzburger; M Matschiner
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Is the species flock concept operational? The Antarctic shelf case.

Authors:  Guillaume Lecointre; Nadia Améziane; Marie-Catherine Boisselier; Céline Bonillo; Frédéric Busson; Romain Causse; Anne Chenuil; Arnaud Couloux; Jean-Pierre Coutanceau; Corinne Cruaud; Cédric d'Udekem d'Acoz; Chantal De Ridder; Gael Denys; Agnès Dettaï; Guy Duhamel; Marc Eléaume; Jean-Pierre Féral; Cyril Gallut; Charlotte Havermans; Christoph Held; Lenaïg Hemery; Anne-Claire Lautrédou; Patrick Martin; Catherine Ozouf-Costaz; Benjamin Pierrat; Patrice Pruvost; Nicolas Puillandre; Sarah Samadi; Thomas Saucède; Christoph Schubart; Bruno David
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A phylogenetic re-analysis of groupers with applications for ciguatera fish poisoning.

Authors:  Charlotte Schoelinck; Damien D Hinsinger; Agnès Dettaï; Corinne Cruaud; Jean-Lou Justine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cold Fusion: Massive Karyotype Evolution in the Antarctic Bullhead Notothen Notothenia coriiceps.

Authors:  Angel Amores; Catherine A Wilson; Corey A H Allard; H William Detrich; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Multiple independent chromosomal fusions accompanied the radiation of the Antarctic teleost genus Trematomus (Notothenioidei:Nototheniidae).

Authors:  Juliette Auvinet; Paula Graça; Agnès Dettai; Angel Amores; John H Postlethwait; H William Detrich; Catherine Ozouf-Costaz; Olivier Coriton; Dominique Higuet
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.