PURPOSE: To develop and validate modified Look-Locker (MOLLI) protocols to generate myocardial T1 maps within clinically acceptable breath-hold durations and to compare partition coefficients (λ) of gadolinium (Gd)-DTPA determined from either bolus injection (BI) or continuous infusion (CI) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1 mapping was performed in phantoms and in 10 volunteers on a 1.5T scanner using the standard (3-3-5) MOLLI technique and two MOLLI schemes with shorter breath-hold durations. Imaging was performed precontrast and every 5 minutes following a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA and a 15-minute delayed continuous infusion of 0.001 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA until equilibrium T1 in the myocardium was achieved to enable direct comparison of T1 relaxation times between techniques and λ's between the BI and CI methods. RESULTS: There was good agreement of T1 values between the 3-3-5 standard MOLLI protocol and the modified 3-5 MOLLI protocol in both phantom studies over a range of heart rates and in human subjects. Both MOLLI protocols produced similar measurements of λ using both the BI and CI methods. CONCLUSION: A reduced breath-hold MOLLI T1 mapping protocol combined with the BI method can accurately characterize T1 and λ in clinically applicable breath-hold durations without requiring a long equilibrium phase infusion.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate modified Look-Locker (MOLLI) protocols to generate myocardial T1 maps within clinically acceptable breath-hold durations and to compare partition coefficients (λ) of gadolinium (Gd)-DTPA determined from either bolus injection (BI) or continuous infusion (CI) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS:T1 mapping was performed in phantoms and in 10 volunteers on a 1.5T scanner using the standard (3-3-5) MOLLI technique and two MOLLI schemes with shorter breath-hold durations. Imaging was performed precontrast and every 5 minutes following a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA and a 15-minute delayed continuous infusion of 0.001 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA until equilibrium T1 in the myocardium was achieved to enable direct comparison of T1 relaxation times between techniques and λ's between the BI and CI methods. RESULTS: There was good agreement of T1 values between the 3-3-5 standard MOLLI protocol and the modified 3-5 MOLLI protocol in both phantom studies over a range of heart rates and in human subjects. Both MOLLI protocols produced similar measurements of λ using both the BI and CI methods. CONCLUSION: A reduced breath-hold MOLLI T1 mapping protocol combined with the BI method can accurately characterize T1 and λ in clinically applicable breath-hold durations without requiring a long equilibrium phase infusion.
Authors: Andrew S Flett; Martin P Hayward; Michael T Ashworth; Michael S Hansen; Andrew M Taylor; Perry M Elliott; Christopher McGregor; James C Moon Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sebastian Flacke; John S Allen; Jon M Chia; James H Wible; M Peri Periasamy; Max D Adams; I Kofi Adzamli; Christine H Lorenz Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-01-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: L D Diesbourg; F S Prato; G Wisenberg; D J Drost; T P Marshall; S E Carroll; B O'Neill Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Daniel R Messroghli; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Sebastian Kozerke; David M Higgins; Mohan U Sivananthan; John P Ridgway Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Erik B Schelbert; Stephen M Testa; Christopher G Meier; William J Ceyrolles; Joshua E Levenson; Alexander J Blair; Peter Kellman; Bobby L Jones; Daniel R Ludwig; David Schwartzman; Sanjeev G Shroff; Timothy C Wong Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira; Erica Dall'Armellina; Lowri E Cochlin; Andreas Greiser; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Francesco Sardanelli; Simone Schiaffino; Moreno Zanardo; Francesco Secchi; Paola Maria Cannaò; Federico Ambrogi; Giovanni Di Leo Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hui Xue; Saurabh Shah; Andreas Greiser; Christoph Guetter; Arne Littmann; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Andrew E Arai; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Jens Guehring; Peter Kellman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sujith Kuruvilla; Rajesh Janardhanan; Patrick Antkowiak; Ellen C Keeley; Nebiyu Adenaw; Jeremy Brooks; Frederick H Epstein; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-01-07
Authors: Na'ama Avitzur; Alessandro Satriano; Muhammad Afzal; Mariam Narous; Yoko Mikami; Reis Hansen; Gary Dobko; Jacqueline Flewitt; Carmen P Lydell; Andrew G Howarth; Kelvin Chow; Nowell M Fine; James A White Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 2.357