Literature DB >> 23197334

Visual search in divided areas: dividers initially interfere with and later facilitate visual search.

Ryoichi Nakashima1, Kazuhiko Yokosawa.   

Abstract

A common search paradigm requires observers to search for a target among undivided spatial arrays of many items. Yet our visual environment is populated with items that are typically arranged within smaller (subdivided) spatial areas outlined by dividers (e.g., frames). It remains unclear how dividers impact visual search performance. In this study, we manipulated the presence and absence of frames and the number of frames subdividing search displays. Observers searched for a target O among Cs, a typically inefficient search task, and for a target C among Os, a typically efficient search. The results indicated that the presence of divider frames in a search display initially interferes with visual search tasks when targets are quickly detected (i.e., efficient search), leading to early interference; conversely, frames later facilitate visual search in tasks in which targets take longer to detect (i.e., inefficient search), leading to late facilitation. Such interference and facilitation appear only for conditions with a specific number of frames. Relative to previous studies of grouping (due to item proximity or similarity), these findings suggest that frame enclosures of multiple items may induce a grouping effect that influences search performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23197334     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0402-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Lost in the supermarket: Quantifying the cost of partitioning memory sets in hybrid search.

Authors:  Sage E P Boettcher; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

2.  Task-Driven Evaluation of Aggregation in Time Series Visualization.

Authors:  Danielle Albers; Michael Correll; Michael Gleicher
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2014

3.  Eye-head coordination for visual cognitive processing.

Authors:  Yu Fang; Ryoichi Nakashima; Kazumichi Matsumiya; Ichiro Kuriki; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Temporal Characteristics of Radiologists' and Novices' Lesion Detection in Viewing Medical Images Presented Rapidly and Sequentially.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Yuya Komori; Eriko Maeda; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-07

5.  Facilitation of visual perception in head direction: visual attention modulation based on head direction.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Why do we move our head to look at an object in our peripheral region? Lateral viewing interferes with attentive search.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Task-irrelevant spatial dividers facilitate counting and numerosity estimation.

Authors:  Qi Li; Ryoichi Nakashima; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.