Literature DB >> 23197247

Application of ED-optimality to screening experiments for analgesic compounds in an experimental model of neuropathic pain.

A Taneja1, J Nyberg, E C M de Lange, M Danhof, O Della Pasqua.   

Abstract

In spite of the evidence regarding high variability in the response to evoked pain, little attention has been paid to its impact on the screening of drugs for inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In this study, we explore the feasibility of introducing optimality concepts to experimental protocols, enabling estimation of parameter and model uncertainty. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic data from different experiments in rats were pooled and modelled using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Pain data on gabapentin and placebo-treated animals were generated in the complete Freund's adjuvant model of neuropathic pain. A logistic regression model was applied to optimise sampling times and dose levels to be used in an experimental protocol. Drug potency (EC(50)) and interindividual variability (IIV) were considered the parameters of interest. Different experimental designs were tested and validated by SSE (stochastic simulation and estimation) taking into account relevant exposure ranges. The pharmacokinetics of gabapentin was described by a two-compartment PK model with first order absorption (CL = 0.159 l h(-1), V(2) = 0.118 l, V(3) = 0.253 l, Ka = 0.26 h(-1), Q = 1.22 l h(-1)). Drug potency (EC(50)) for the anti-allodynic effects was estimated to be 1400 ng ml(-1). Protocol optimisation improved bias and precision of the EC50 by 6 and 11.9. %, respectively, whilst IIV estimates showed improvement of 31.89 and 14.91 %, respectively. Our results show that variability in behavioural models of evoked pain response leads to uncertainty in drug potency estimates, with potential impact on the ranking of compounds during screening. As illustrated for gabapentin, ED-optimality concepts enable analysis of discrete data taking into account experimental constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197247     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-012-9278-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  24 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of nociception.

Authors:  D Le Bars; M Gozariu; S W Cadden
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 2.  A series of case studies: practical methodology for identifying antinociceptive multi-target drugs.

Authors:  Min-Hee Pang; Yuntae Kim; Kyung Woon Jung; Sunyoung Cho; Doo H Lee
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 3.  Future directions in neuropathic pain therapy: closing the translational loop.

Authors:  Miroslav Backonja; Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling in translational drug research.

Authors:  Meindert Danhof; Elizabeth C M de Lange; Oscar E Della Pasqua; Bart A Ploeger; Rob A Voskuyl
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 14.819

5.  Pharmacokinetic design optimization in children and estimation of maturation parameters: example of cytochrome P450 3A4.

Authors:  Marion Bouillon-Pichault; Vincent Jullien; Caroline Bazzoli; Gérard Pons; Michel Tod
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 6.  Optimal design of pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.080

7.  Comparison of ED, EID, and API criteria for the robust optimization of sampling times in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M Tod; J M Rocchisani
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1997-08

Review 8.  Translation of drug effects from experimental models of neuropathic pain and analgesia to humans.

Authors:  Amit Taneja; Vincenzo Luca Di Iorio; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 9.  Emerging drugs in neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Ian Gilron; Terence J Coderre
Journal:  Expert Opin Emerg Drugs       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 10.  Pain-like behaviours in animals - how human are they?

Authors:  Gordon Blackburn-Munro
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 14.819

View more
  6 in total

1.  Optimised protocol design for the screening of analgesic compounds in neuropathic pain.

Authors:  A Taneja; J Nyberg; M Danhof; O Della Pasqua
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Gabapentin in a CFA-induced Inflammatory Hyperalgesia Rat Model.

Authors:  Malte Selch Larsen; Ron Keizer; Gordon Munro; Arne Mørk; René Holm; Rada Savic; Mads Kreilgaard
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Morphine, Gabapentin and their Combination in the Rat.

Authors:  Theodoros Papathanasiou; Rasmus Vestergaard Juul; Charlotte Gabel-Jensen; Mads Kreilgaard; Trine Meldgaard Lund
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Semi-mechanistic modelling of the analgesic effect of gabapentin in the formalin-induced rat model of experimental pain.

Authors:  A Taneja; I F Troconiz; M Danhof; O Della Pasqua
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Pain burden, sensory profile and inflammatory cytokines of dogs with naturally-occurring neuropathic pain treated with gabapentin alone or with meloxicam.

Authors:  Hélène L M Ruel; Ryota Watanabe; Marina C Evangelista; Guy Beauchamp; Jean-Philippe Auger; Mariela Segura; Paulo V Steagall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in cats.

Authors:  Derek Adrian; Mark G Papich; Ronald Baynes; Emma Stafford; B Duncan X Lascelles
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.