Literature DB >> 23197097

Visual motion speed determines a behavioral switch from forward flight to expansion avoidance in Drosophila.

Michael B Reiser1, Michael H Dickinson.   

Abstract

As an animal translates through the world, its eyes will experience a radiating pattern of optic flow in which there is a focus of expansion directly in front and a focus of contraction behind. For flying fruit flies, recent experiments indicate that flies actively steer away from patterns of expansion. Whereas such a reflex makes sense for avoiding obstacles, it presents a paradox of sorts because an insect could not navigate stably through a visual scene unless it tolerated flight towards a focus of expansion during episodes of forward translation. One possible solution to this paradox is that a fly's behavior might change such that it steers away from strong expansion, but actively steers towards weak expansion. In this study, we use a tethered flight arena to investigate the influence of stimulus strength on the magnitude and direction of turning responses to visual expansion in flies. These experiments indicate that the expansion-avoidance behavior is speed dependent. At slower speeds of expansion, flies exhibit an attraction to the focus of expansion, whereas the behavior transforms to expansion avoidance at higher speeds. Open-loop experiments indicate that this inversion of the expansion-avoidance response depends on whether or not the head is fixed to the thorax. The inversion of the expansion-avoidance response with stimulus strength has a clear manifestation under closed-loop conditions. Flies will actively orient towards a focus of expansion at low temporal frequency but steer away from it at high temporal frequency. The change in the response with temporal frequency does not require motion stimuli directly in front or behind the fly. Animals in which the stimulus was presented within 120 deg sectors on each side consistently steered towards expansion at low temporal frequency and steered towards contraction at high temporal frequency. A simple model based on an array of Hassenstein-Reichardt type elementary movement detectors suggests that the inversion of the expansion-avoidance reflex can explain the spatial distribution of straight flight segments and collision-avoidance saccades when flies fly freely within an open circular arena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197097     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.074732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Customizable Recorder of Animal Kinesis (CRoAK): A multi-axis instrumented enclosure for measuring animal movements.

Authors:  Saumya Gupta; Peter M Marchetto; Mark A Bee
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2020-06-10

Review 2.  The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael H Dickinson; Florian T Muijres
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Estimating Orientation of Flying Fruit Flies.

Authors:  Xi En Cheng; Shuo Hong Wang; Zhi-Ming Qian; Yan Qiu Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Motion as a source of environmental information: a fresh view on biological motion computation by insect brains.

Authors:  Martin Egelhaaf; Roland Kern; Jens Peter Lindemann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Free flight odor tracking in Drosophila: Effect of wing chemosensors, sex and pheromonal gene regulation.

Authors:  Benjamin Houot; Vincent Gigot; Alain Robichon; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Virtual reality for freely moving animals.

Authors:  John R Stowers; Maximilian Hofbauer; Renaud Bastien; Johannes Griessner; Peter Higgins; Sarfarazhussain Farooqui; Ruth M Fischer; Karin Nowikovsky; Wulf Haubensak; Iain D Couzin; Kristin Tessmar-Raible; Andrew D Straw
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Avoiding obstacles while intercepting a moving target: a miniature fly's solution.

Authors:  Samuel T Fabian; Mary E Sumner; Trevor J Wardill; Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Figure-ground discrimination behavior in Drosophila. II. Visual influences on head movement behavior.

Authors:  Jessica L Fox; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.