Literature DB >> 23196824

Bioequivalence between generic tacrolimus products marketed in Spain by adjusted indirect comparison.

Marta Herranz1, Susana Morales-Alcelay, Ma Teresa Corredera-Hernández, José María de la Torre-Alvarado, Antonio Blázquez-Pérez, Ma Luisa Suárez-Gea, Covadonga Alvarez, Alfredo García-Arieta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to investigate the relative bioavailability between the generic tacrolimus products that are presently authorized in Spain by adjusted indirect comparison. This was based on demonstration of bioequivalence with the reference product (Prograf, Astellas Pharma), which makes these generic tacrolimus products prescribable, switchable and therapeutically equivalent to the reference product; yet, according to Spanish legislation, only prescribers can switch tacrolimus-containing products.
METHODS: Data from independent bioequivalence studies that compare each generic product with the reference product were combined by adjusted indirect comparisons to investigate the relative bioavailability between generic drug products, since there is no direct bioequivalence study comparing generics to each other.
RESULTS: Eight generic tacrolimus products in the form of capsules are presently authorized in Spain, but only five are marketed. These eight products represent only three different generic product developments. One product is authorized with four different names/companies, while another is authorized under three different names/companies. The adjusted indirect comparisons between generic products show bioequivalence within the conventional 80-125 % confidence interval acceptance criteria for area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax).
CONCLUSION: Not only are the generic products bioequivalent with the reference product, but also with each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23196824     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1456-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  16 in total

1.  The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  H C Bucher; G H Guyatt; L E Griffith; S D Walter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved.

Authors:  B L WELCH
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1947       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Bioequivalence studies of tacrolimus capsule under fasting and fed conditions in healthy male and female subjects.

Authors:  Audrey Lainesse; Saleh Hussain; Tausif Monif; Simrit Reyar; Sudhakar Koundinya Tippabhotla; Ashish Madan; Nageshwar Rao Thudi
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  2008

4.  [Bioequivalence and generics of index drugs with narrow therapeutic margins].

Authors:  Pascal Le Corre
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Bioequivalence of a new strength tacrolimus capsule under development.

Authors:  I Bekersky; D Dressler; G W Boswell; B Fergen; W Tracewell; Q Mekki
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Meta-analysis for bioequivalence review.

Authors:  S C Chow; J Liu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Authors:  A M Glenny; D G Altman; F Song; C Sakarovitch; J J Deeks; R D'Amico; M Bradburn; A J Eastwood
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  A randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover bioavailability study of two oral formulations of tacrolimus in healthy Korean adults.

Authors:  Kyungsoo Park; Yu Seun Kim; Kwang-Il Kwon; Min Soo Park; Yoon Jung Lee; Kyung Hwan Kim
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Bioequivalence of two tacrolimus formulations under fasting conditions in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  Philip Mathew; Jayanta Mandal; Kamlesh Patel; Kshitij Soni; Geetanjali Tangudu; Rakesh Patel; Prashant Kale
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Bioequivalence of 1 and 5 mg tacrolimus capsules using a replicate study design.

Authors:  I Bekersky; D Dressler; W Colburn; Q Mekki
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.126

View more
  9 in total

1.  Influence of point estimates and study power of bioequivalence studies on establishing bioequivalence between generics by adjusted indirect comparisons.

Authors:  Luther Gwaza; John Gordon; Henrike Potthast; Jan Welink; Hubert Leufkens; Matthias Stahl; Alfredo García-Arieta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Adjusted indirect comparisons to assess bioequivalence between generic clopidogrel products in Serbia.

Authors:  Zorica Pejčić; Katarina Vučićević; Alfredo García-Arieta; Branislava Miljković
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Evaluating the Feasibility of Use of a Foreign Reference Product for Generic Drug Applications: A Retrospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yi-Lin Wang; Li-Feng Hsu
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Practical application of statistical models aimed at assessing bioequivalence through network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Messori
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Indirect bioequivalence assessment using network meta-analyses.

Authors:  A Ring; T B S Morris; K Hohl; R Schall
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Generic products of antiepileptic drugs: a perspective on bioequivalence, bioavailability, and formulation switches using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Vangelis Karalis; Panos Macheras; Meir Bialer
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Investigation into the interchangeability of generic formulations using immunosuppressants and a broad selection of medicines.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Steven Teerenstra; Cees Neef; David Burger; Marc Maliepaard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  New tablet formulation of tacrolimus with smaller interindividual variability may become a better treatment option than the conventional capsule formulation in organ transplant patients.

Authors:  Yu Kyong Kim; Anhye Kim; Shin Jung Park; Howard Lee
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 9.  Equivalence and interchangeability of narrow therapeutic index drugs in organ transplantation.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-08-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.