Literature DB >> 23194492

Transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-surgical-risk patients with aortic stenosis: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

Azeem Latib1, Francesco Maisano, Letizia Bertoldi, Andrea Giacomini, Joanne Shannon, Micaela Cioni, Alfonso Ielasi, Filippo Figini, Kensuke Tagaki, Annalisa Franco, Remo Daniel Covello, Antonio Grimaldi, Pietro Spagnolo, Gill Louise Buchannan, Mauro Carlino, Alaide Chieffo, Matteo Montorfano, Ottavio Alfieri, Antonio Colombo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited real-world data comparing outcomes after transcatheter (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in intermediate-surgical-risk patients with aortic stenosis are available.
METHODS: We identified 182 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR via the transfemoral (TF) route (November 2007-February 2011) and 111 moderate-to-high-risk historical case controls undergoing SAVR (August 2003-July 2008). Using propensity score matching based on clinical characteristics and surgical risk scores, we compared clinical outcomes in 111 matched patients. Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions were applied for end point adjudication.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics, in particular Logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (23.2 ± 15.1 vs 24.4 ± 13.4) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (4.6 ± 2.3 vs 4.6 ± 2.6), were well matched between groups. Transfemoral TAVR was associated with more vascular complications (33.3% vs 0.9%, P < .001). On the other hand, acute kidney injury was more frequent after SAVR (8.1% vs 26.1%, P < .001). The rates of all-cause mortality in both TF-TAVR and SAVR groups was1.8% at 30 days (P = 1.00) and 6.4% and 8.1%, respectively, at 1 year (P = .80). At 1 year, the rate of cerebrovascular events was similar in the 2 groups (4.6% vs 9.1%, P = .19).
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort of intermediate-surgical-risk patients with aortic stenosis, TF-TAVR and SAVR were associated with similar mortality rates during follow-up but with a different spectrum of periprocedural complications. Furthermore, the survival rate after TF-TAVR in this group of elderly patients with intermediate Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was encouraging.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23194492     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  21 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: indications and beyond the clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael J Reardon
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

2.  Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement and medical treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials.

Authors:  A Ak; I Porokhovnikov; F Kuethe; P C Schulze; M Noutsias; P Schlattmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement-state of the art and a glimpse to the future: 'the Tailored Approach'.

Authors:  Francesco Bedogni; Alessandro Frigiola; Marco Ranucci; Nedy Brambilla; Rocco Antonio Montone; Mauro Agnifili; Lorenzo Menicanti; Luca Testa
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 1.803

4.  Prognostic value of body mass index and body surface area on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Mani Arsalan; Giovanni Filardo; Won-Keun Kim; John J Squiers; Benjamin Pollock; Christoph Liebetrau; Johannes Blumenstein; Jörg Kempfert; Arnaud Van Linden; Annika Arsalan-Werner; Christian Hamm; Michael J Mack; Helge Moellmann; Thomas Walther
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Transcatheter vs surgical aortic-valve replacement in low- to intermediate-surgical-risk candidates: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Safi U Khan; Ahmad N Lone; Muhammad A Saleem; Edo Kaluski
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes, Indications, Complications, and Innovations.

Authors:  Michael N Young; Ignacio Inglessis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 7.  Matching patients with the ever-expanding range of TAVI devices.

Authors:  Brandon M Jones; Amar Krishnaswamy; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Wael A Jaber; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Surgical site infections in neonates and infants: is antibiotic prophylaxis needed for longer than 24 h?

Authors:  Lan T Vu; Eric Vittinghoff; Kerilyn K Nobuhara; Diana L Farmer; Hanmin Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Meta-Analysis Comparing the Frequency of Stroke After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Kuldeep Shah; Zakeih Chaker; Tatiana Busu; Vinay Badhwar; Fahad Alqahtani; Muhammad Alvi; Amelia Adcock; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; Jacob A Misenheimer; Wesley Jones; Amol Bahekar; Melissa Caughey; Cassandra J Ramm; Thomas G Caranasos; Michael Yeung; John P Vavalle
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.