Literature DB >> 23194484

Cardiac imaging approaches to evaluate drug-induced myocardial dysfunction.

Jennifer B Christian1, John K Finkle, Bonnie Ky, Pamela S Douglas, David E Gutstein, Paul D Hockings, Pierre Lainee, Daniel J Lenihan, Jay W Mason, Philip T Sager, Thomas G Todaro, Karen A Hicks, Robert C Kane, Hon-Sum Ko, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Eric L Michelson, James Milligan, Jiefen Y Munley, Joel S Raichlen, Amir Shahlaee, Colette Strnadova, Brenda Ye, J Rick Turner.   

Abstract

The ability to make informed benefit-risk assessments for potentially cardiotoxic new compounds is of considerable interest and importance at the public health, drug development, and individual patient levels. Cardiac imaging approaches in the evaluation of drug-induced myocardial dysfunction will likely play an increasing role. However, the optimal choice of myocardial imaging modality and the recommended frequency of monitoring are undefined. These decisions are complicated by the array of imaging techniques, which have varying sensitivities, specificities, availabilities, local expertise, safety, and costs, and by the variable time-course of tissue damage, functional myocardial depression, or recovery of function. This White Paper summarizes scientific discussions of members of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium on the main factors to consider when selecting nonclinical and clinical cardiac function imaging techniques in drug development. We focus on 3 commonly used imaging modalities in the evaluation of cardiac function: echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radionuclide (nuclear) imaging and highlight areas for future research.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23194484      PMCID: PMC3686274          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  76 in total

1.  Role of three-dimensional echocardiography in breast cancer: comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography, multiple-gated acquisition scans, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan Walker; Navdeep Bhullar; Nazanin Fallah-Rad; Matthew Lytwyn; Mehrdad Golian; Tielan Fang; Arthur R Summers; Pawan K Singal; Ivan Barac; Iain D Kirkpatrick; Davinder S Jassal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Is cardiotoxicity being adequately assessed in current trials of cytotoxic and targeted agents in breast cancer?

Authors:  S Verma; M S Ewer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Echocardiographic imaging in clinical trials: American Society of Echocardiography Standards for echocardiography core laboratories: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Jeanne M DeCara; Richard B Devereux; Shelly Duckworth; Julius M Gardin; Wael A Jaber; Annitta J Morehead; Jae K Oh; Michael H Picard; Scott D Solomon; Kevin Wei; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Characterisation of rodent dobutamine echocardiography for preclinical safety pharmacology assessment.

Authors:  Marcello Tontodonati; Nicola Fasdelli; Paolo Repeto; Roberto Dorigatti
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 5.  Troponin measurements during drug development--considerations for monitoring and management of potential cardiotoxicity: an educational collaboration among the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, the Duke Clinical Research Institute, and the US Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  L Kristin Newby; Ignacio Rodriguez; John Finkle; Richard C Becker; Karen A Hicks; Elizabeth Hausner; Ruth Chesler; Courtney Harper; Shari Targum; Brian R Berridge; Eric Lewis; Dana B Walker; Colin Dollery; J Rick Turner; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Validation of MRI measurement of cardiac output in the dog: the effects of dobutamine and minoxidil.

Authors:  Paul D Hockings; Albert L Busza; Joanne Byrne; Bela Patel; Sean C Smart; David G Reid; Heather L Lloyd; Alan White; Karen Pointing; Belinda A Farnfield; Ana Criado-Gonzalez; Greg A Whelan; Gemma L Taylor; Jeffrey M Birmingham; Mark R Slaughter; Janette A Osborne; Axel Krebs-Brown; David Templeton
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.987

7.  Echocardiographic speckle-tracking based strain imaging for rapid cardiovascular phenotyping in mice.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Susan Cheng; Mohit Jain; Soeun Ngoy; Catherine Theodoropoulos; Anna Trujillo; Fen-Chiung Lin; Ronglih Liao
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: a comparison of left ventricular opacification, three-dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Carly Jenkins; Stuart Moir; Jonathan Chan; Dhrubo Rakhit; Brian Haluska; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Doxorubicin cardiomyopathy: evaluation by phonocardiography, endomyocardial biopsy, and cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  M R Bristow; J W Mason; M E Billingham; J R Daniels
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Reconstructed versus real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Carly Jenkins; Rodel Leano; Jonathan Chan; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  1 in total

1.  Utility of 3-dimensional echocardiography, global longitudinal strain, and exercise stress echocardiography to detect cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin-containing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Michel G Khouri; Whitney E Hornsby; Niels Risum; Eric J Velazquez; Samantha Thomas; Amy Lane; Jessica M Scott; Graeme J Koelwyn; James E Herndon; John R Mackey; Pamela S Douglas; Lee W Jones
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 4.872

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.