Literature DB >> 23194128

Preliminary results of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) after fellowship training and experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

Philippe Wolanski1, Charles Chabert, Lee Jones, Tarryn Mullavey, Sharon Walsh, Troy Gianduzzo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To ascertain whether prior experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) shortens the 'learning curve' and therefore improves early patient outcomes when transitioning to robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of the most recent 87 cases of LRP compared with the initial 73 cases of RALP. • LRP was performed via a five-port extraperitoneal approach, while transperitoneal RALP was performed using a four-arm da Vinci S unit.
RESULTS: • The median operative duration for RALP (skin-to-skin, including docking time) rapidly reduced, although never exceeded 3.5 h, for each consecutive set of 10 cases. • Oncological outcomes were preserved with no cases of pT2 positive surgical margins (PSMs) in any group. pT3 PSM rates were not significantly different at 50% and 38% for LRP and RALP, respectively. • Penetrative intercourse rates at 3 months for bilateral nerve-sparing procedures in preoperatively potent patients were similar, at 50% for LRP (median Sexual Health Inventory for Men [SHIM] 17) and 48.1% for RALP (median SHIM 18). The pad-free rate at 3 months was significantly better for RALP at 59.7%, compared with 39.8% for LRP (P= 0.043). • Complications were minimal and comparable for the two groups except for a higher LRP radiological anastomotic leak rate of 16 vs 1% (P= 0.004).
CONCLUSION: • In this comparative series fellowship training and prior experience in LRP resulted in no significant RALP learning curve with regards to oncological and functional outcomes, while maintaining a low complication rate. • A short learning curve existed for operative duration but this improved rapidly and there were no prolonged cases. • Differences in early continence and radiological leaks may reflect changing from an interrupted anastomosis (LRP) to a continuous anastomosis with posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction (RALP).
© 2012 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23194128     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11479.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Huang; Lei Wang; Xinmin Zheng; Xinghuan Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Positive surgical margin rates during the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy learning curve of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

Authors:  Anthony F Adili; Julia Di Giovanni; Emma Kolesar; Nathan C Wong; Jen Hoogenes; Shawn Dason; Bobby Shayegan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Prostatectomies for localized prostate cancer: a mixed comparison network and cumulative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kannan Sridharan; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-23

4.  Acquisition of robotic surgical skills does not require laparoscopic training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roberto Vanin Pinto Ribeiro; João Maximiliano; Guilherme Barreiro; Olavo Haas de Souza Gastal; Pauline Simas Machado; Luciano Paludo Marcelino; Henrique Rasia Bosi; Eduardo Madalosso Zanin; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  The second "time-out": a surgical safety checklist for lengthy robotic surgeries.

Authors:  Joseph B Song; Goutham Vemana; Jonathan M Mobley; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2013-06-03

6.  Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for a single experienced surgeon: comparison with simultaneous laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ja Yoon Ku; Hong Koo Ha
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.400

7.  Transurethral marking incision of the bladder neck: a helpful technique in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy involving post-transurethral resection of the prostate and cancers protruding into the bladder neck.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurokawa; Keiichi Tozawa; Yukihiro Umemoto; Takahiro Yasui; Kentaro Mizuno; Atsushi Okada; Noriyasu Kawai; Yutaro Hayashi; Kenjiro Kohri
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  The influence of previous robotic experience in the initial learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  José Anastácio Dias; Marcos F Dall'oglio; João Roberto Colombo; Rafael F Coelho; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seon Heui Lee; Hyun Ju Seo; Na Rae Lee; Soo Kyung Son; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-04-28

10.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center.

Authors:  Takatsugu Okegawa; Shota Omura; Mio Samejima; Naoki Ninomiya; Satoru Taguchi; Yu Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi; Mitsuhiro Tambo; Hiroshi Fukuhara
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2019-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.