Literature DB >> 23192644

Network analysis of social changes in a captive chimpanzee community following the successful integration of two adult groups.

Anne Marijke Schel1, Bruce Rawlings, Nicolas Claidière, Claudia Wilke, Jen Wathan, Jo Richardson, Sophie Pearson, Elizabeth S Herrelko, Andrew Whiten, Katie Slocombe.   

Abstract

Chimpanzees are highly territorial and have the potential to be extremely aggressive toward unfamiliar individuals. In the wild, transfer between groups is almost exclusively completed by nulliparous females, yet in captivity there is often a need to introduce and integrate a range of individuals, including adult males. We describe the process of successfully integrating two groups of chimpanzees, each containing 11 individuals, in the Budongo Trail facility at the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland's Edinburgh Zoo. We use social network analysis to document changes in group dynamics within this population over the 16 months following integration. Aggression rates were low overall and members of the two original groups engaged in significantly fewer aggressive interactions over time. Association and grooming data indicate that relationships between members of the original groups became stronger and more affiliative with time. Despite these positive indicators the association data revealed the continued existence of two distinct subgroups, a year after integration. Our data show that when given complex space and freedom to exhibit natural fission-fusion groupings, in which the chimpanzees choose whom they wish to associate and interact with, the building of strong affiliative relationships with unfamiliar individuals is a very gradual process.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23192644     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  9 in total

1.  Social grooming network in captive chimpanzees: does the wild or captive origin of group members affect sociality?

Authors:  Marine Levé; Cédric Sueur; Odile Petit; Tetsuro Matsuzawa; Satoshi Hirata
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Social network and dominance hierarchy analyses at Chimpanzee Sanctuary Northwest.

Authors:  Jake A Funkhouser; Jessica A Mayhew; John B Mulcahy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Is music enriching for group-housed captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)?

Authors:  Emma K Wallace; Drew Altschul; Karoline Körfer; Benjamin Benti; Amanda Kaeser; Susan Lambeth; Bridget M Waller; Katie E Slocombe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Understanding Temporal Social Dynamics in Zoo Animal Management: An Elephant Case Study.

Authors:  Ellen Williams; Samantha Bremner-Harrison; Carol Hall; Anne Carter
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Social Interactions in Zoo-Housed Elephants: Factors Affecting Social Relationships.

Authors:  Ellen Williams; Anne Carter; Carol Hall; Samantha Bremner-Harrison
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) console a bereaved mother?

Authors:  Zoë Goldsborough; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Kayla W T Kolff; Frans B M de Waal; Christine E Webb
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Primate drum kit: a system for studying acoustic pattern production by non-human primates using acceleration and strain sensors.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Vicente Matellán Olivera; Bruno Gingras; Riccardo Hofer; Carlos Rodríguez Hernández; Ruth-Sophie Sonnweber; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates.

Authors:  Jamie Whitehouse; Jérôme Micheletta; Lauren E Powell; Celia Bordier; Bridget M Waller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) display limited behavioural flexibility when faced with a changing foraging task requiring tool use.

Authors:  Rachel A Harrison; Andrew Whiten
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.