Literature DB >> 23192566

Face memory deficits in patients deprived of early visual input by bilateral congenital cataracts.

Adélaïde de Heering1, Daphne Maurer.   

Abstract

Patients treated for bilateral congenital cataract are later impaired on several hallmarks of adults' expertise with upright faces but report no problem with remembering faces. Here, we provide the first formal data on their face memory. We compared 12 adults with a history of visual deprivation from bilateral congenital cataracts to 24 age-matched controls with normal vision on their ability to recognize famous and recently learned faces, and on their subjective impression of their face memory. Bilateral congenital cataract patients demonstrated a prosopagnosic-like deficit, being slower and less accurate in recognizing both famous faces and recently learned faces, despite not differing on most questions about their impression of their face memory. Patients' results on three perceptual tasks (the composite face effect, the Benton test of recognizing faces through a change in point of view, and the Jane test of sensitivity to feature spacing) were also not correlated with their face memory deficits. These results suggest that early visual input is necessary not only for perceptual expertise in differentiating among unfamiliar upright faces, but also for normal accuracy in remembering the identity of individual faces.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract; face memory; faces; prosopagnosia; visual deprivation

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23192566     DOI: 10.1002/dev.21094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  11 in total

1.  Self-reported face recognition is highly valid, but alone is not highly discriminative of prosopagnosia-level performance on objective assessments.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Elyana Saad; Ayooluwa O Douglas; Laura Germine; Jeremy B Wilmer; Joseph M DeGutis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Potential downside of high initial visual acuity.

Authors:  Lukas Vogelsang; Sharon Gilad-Gutnick; Evan Ehrenberg; Albert Yonas; Sidney Diamond; Richard Held; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Alyson Saville
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Understanding individual face discrimination by means of fast periodic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Extensive childhood experience with Pokémon suggests eccentricity drives organization of visual cortex.

Authors:  Jesse Gomez; Michael Barnett; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-05-06

7.  Altered representation of facial expressions after early visual deprivation.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Gao; Daphne Maurer; Mayu Nishimura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-21

Review 8.  Global processing in amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Joanna Black; Shuan Dai; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

9.  Biological Action Identification Does Not Require Early Visual Input for Development.

Authors:  Siddhart S Rajendran; Davide Bottari; Idris Shareef; Kabilan Pitchaimuthu; Suddha Sourav; Nikolaus F Troje; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-10-28

10.  The Detrimental Effect of Noisy Visual Input on the Visual Development of Human Infants.

Authors:  Erping Long; Xiaoqing Gao; Yifan Xiang; Zhenzhen Liu; Andi Xu; Xiucheng Huang; Yan Zhang; Yi Zhu; Chuan Chen; Haotian Lin
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.