Literature DB >> 23192228

Lack of either estrogen or progesterone receptor expression is associated with poor survival outcome among luminal A breast cancer subtype.

Seho Park1, Byeong-Woo Park, Tae Hyun Kim, Chang Wan Jeon, Han-Sung Kang, Jung-Eun Choi, Ki-Tae Hwang, In Cheol Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the impact of lack of either estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) on characteristics and outcomes among luminal A breast cancer subtype treated with endocrine with or without chemotherapeutic agents.
METHODS: The luminal A subtype was categorized into three subgroups: ER+/PR+, ER+/PR-, and ER-/PR+. All tumors were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Clinicopathological features and survival were analyzed using the Severance Hospital dataset (n = 1,180) and were validated by the nationwide Korean Breast Cancer Society (KBCS) registry (n = 9,916).
RESULTS: Despite the different distribution of ER/PR status, tumor stage, grade, and local therapies between the two datasets, similarly ER+/PR+ showed smaller size and good differentiation, ER+/PR- patients had the oldest age at diagnosis, and ER-/PR+ was associated with the youngest age at onset and grade III tumor. Single hormone receptor-positive subgroups demonstrated worse disease-related outcomes than the ER+/PR+ subgroup. These associations were confirmed by the KBCS dataset. This trend was also demonstrated in the subpopulation of 1,944 patients with Ki-67 < 14 %. Inferior survival of single receptor-positive tumors was more definite among node-positive patients even when receiving both chemo-endocrine therapies.
CONCLUSIONS: Current results suggest that the luminal A subtype is also heterogeneous and each subgroup has unique clinicopathologic characteristics. Lack of either ER or PR expression is associated with worse survival, especially among node-positive luminal A subtype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23192228     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2772-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  14 in total

1.  Single hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients experienced poor survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Wu; F Fu; L Chen; Y Lin; P Yang; C Wang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Prognostic role of progesterone receptor expression in a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Adele Caldarella; Alessandro Barchielli
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Oestrogen Receptor-Positive/Progesterone Receptor-Negative/Her2-Negative Breast Cancer According to a Novel Definition of Negative Progesterone Receptor Status: A Large Population-Based Study from China.

Authors:  An-qi Li; Shu-ling Zhou; Ming Li; Yan Xu; Ruo-hong Shui; Bao-hua Yu; Wen-tao Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Progesterone receptor loss identifies hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer subgroups at higher risk of relapse: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jia-Yuan Sun; San-Gang Wu; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The prognostic value of age for invasive lobular breast cancer depending on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor-defined subtypes: A NCDB analysis.

Authors:  Jieqiong Liu; Kai Chen; Kai Mao; Fengxi Su; Qiang Liu; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-02-02

6.  Is there an association between enhanced choline and β-catenin pathway in breast cancer? A pilot study by MR Spectroscopy and ELISA.

Authors:  Khushbu Agarwal; Gururao Hariprasad; Komal Rani; Uma Sharma; Sandeep R Mathur; Vurthaluru Seenu; Rajinder Parshad; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Prognostic values of negative estrogen or progesterone receptor expression in patients with luminal B HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Chansub Park; Kyeongmee Park; Jiyoung Kim; Youngjoo Sin; Inseok Park; Hyunjin Cho; Keunho Yang; Byung Noe Bae; Ki Whan Kim; Sookyung Ahn; Geumhee Gwak
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 8.  Improving Pathological Assessment of Breast Cancer by Employing Array-Based Transcriptome Analysis.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Mihály; Balázs Győrffy
Journal:  Microarrays (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-29

9.  Assessment of the Prognostic Staging System of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition for Breast Cancer: Comparisons with the Conventional Anatomic Staging System.

Authors:  Eun Jin Kim; Hyung Seok Park; Jee Ye Kim; Seung Il Kim; Young-Up Cho; Byeong-Woo Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Prognostic Significance of Single Progesterone Receptor Positivity: A Comparison Study of Estrogen Receptor Negative/Progesterone Receptor Positive/Her2 Negative Primary Breast Cancer With Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ying Fan; Xiaoyan Ding; Binghe Xu; Fei Ma; Peng Yuan; Jiayu Wang; Pin Zhang; Qing Li; Yang Luo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.