Literature DB >> 23190721

The difference between critical care initiation anion gap and prehospital admission anion gap is predictive of mortality in critical illness.

Michael S Lipnick1, Andrea B Braun, Joyce Ting-Wai Cheung, Fiona K Gibbons, Kenneth B Christopher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the delta anion gap defined as difference between critical care initiation standard anion gap and prehospital admission standard anion gap is associated with all cause mortality in the critically ill.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
SETTING: Two hundred nine medical and surgical intensive care beds in two hospitals in Boston, MA. PATIENTS: Eighteen thousand nine hundred eighty-five patients, age ≥18 yrs, who received critical care between 1997 and 2007. MEASUREMENTS: The exposure of interest was delta anion gap and categorized a priori as <0, 0-5, 5-10, and >10 mEq/L. Logistic regression examined death by days 30, 90, and 365 postcritical care initiation and in-hospital mortality. Adjusted odds ratios were estimated by multivariable logistic regression models. The discrimination of delta anion gap for 30-day mortality was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic curves performed for a subset of patients with all laboratory data required to analyze the data via physical chemical principles (n = 664).
INTERVENTIONS: None.
RESULTS: Delta anion gap was a particularly strong predictor of 30-day mortality with a significant risk gradient across delta anion gap quartiles following multivariable adjustment: delta anion gap <0 mEq/L odds ratio 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.67-0.81; p < 0.0001); delta anion gap 5-10 mEq/L odds ratio 1.56 (95% confidence interval 1.35-1.81; p < 0.0001); delta anion gap >10 mEq/L odds ratio 2.18 (95% confidence interval 1.76-2.71; p < 0.0001); and all relative to patients with delta anion gap 0-5 mEq/L. Similar significant robust associations post multivariable adjustments are seen with death by days 90 and 365 as well as in-hospital mortality. Correcting for albumin or limiting the cohort to patients with standard anion gap at critical care initiation of 10-18 mEq/L did not materially change the delta anion gap-mortality association. Delta anion gap has similarly moderate discriminative ability for 30-day mortality in comparison to standard base excess and strong ion gap.
CONCLUSION: An increase in standard anion gap at critical care initiation relative to prehospital admission standard anion gap is a predictor of the risk of all cause patient mortality in the critically ill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23190721     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826764cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  6 in total

Review 1.  The serum anion gap in the evaluation of acid-base disorders: what are its limitations and can its effectiveness be improved?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kraut; Glenn T Nagami
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Association between delta anion gap and hospital mortality for patients in cardiothoracic surgery recovery unit: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kai Xie; Chao Zheng; Gao-Ming Wang; Yi-Fei Diao; Chao Luo; Ellen Wang; Li-Wen Hu; Zhi-Jian Ren; Jing Luo; Bin-Hui Ren; Yi Shen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.030

3.  Serum Anion Gap Predicts All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sung Woo Lee; Sejoong Kim; Ki Young Na; Ran-Hui Cha; Shin Wook Kang; Cheol Whee Park; Dae Ryong Cha; Sung Gyun Kim; Sun Ae Yoon; Sang Youb Han; Jung Hwan Park; Jae Hyun Chang; Chun Soo Lim; Yon Su Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pulmonary Infection Is an Independent Risk Factor for Long-Term Mortality and Quality of Life for Sepsis Patients.

Authors:  Xiao-Li He; Xue-Lian Liao; Zhi-Chao Xie; Li Han; Xiao-Lei Yang; Yan Kang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Anion gap as a prognostic tool for risk stratification in critically ill patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stella Andrea Glasmacher; William Stones
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of the validity of anion gap as a screening tool for hyperlactatemia.

Authors:  Stella Andrea Glasmacher; William Stones
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-11-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.