BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate factors influencing the adoption, implementation, and institutionalization process of JUMP-in-a multilevel school-based physical activity promotion program-to optimize the dissemination of the intervention and improve its effectiveness. The process evaluation concerned the constraints and success and failure factors at sociopolitical, organizational, user, and intervention levels. METHODS: A mixed methods approach including qualitative and quantitative data was conducted during two school years (2006-2008). RESULTS: JUMP-in was successfully embedded in the Amsterdam municipal policy and in the organizational structure and daily practices of the sectors involved. A general impeding factor was the complexity of the multilevel programme requiring multidisciplinary collaboration between organizations. In addition, there was a discrepancy between the recommendation to standardize and simplify the innovation and the need to tailor the strategies to local environmental, social, and cultural aspects. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation provides challenges and remedies for managing discrepancies between prerequisites for an effective innovation and demands of daily implementation practice. The main recommendations are (a) standardized, simplified guidelines; (b) stepwise implementation; (c) formalized coalitions, integration of policy, and synchronization of tasks and protocols; and (d) smart planning and control by clear communication and feedback instruments. If these recommendations are incorporated into the JUMP-in intervention and organization, increased effectiveness and long-term effects can be expected.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate factors influencing the adoption, implementation, and institutionalization process of JUMP-in-a multilevel school-based physical activity promotion program-to optimize the dissemination of the intervention and improve its effectiveness. The process evaluation concerned the constraints and success and failure factors at sociopolitical, organizational, user, and intervention levels. METHODS: A mixed methods approach including qualitative and quantitative data was conducted during two school years (2006-2008). RESULTS: JUMP-in was successfully embedded in the Amsterdam municipal policy and in the organizational structure and daily practices of the sectors involved. A general impeding factor was the complexity of the multilevel programme requiring multidisciplinary collaboration between organizations. In addition, there was a discrepancy between the recommendation to standardize and simplify the innovation and the need to tailor the strategies to local environmental, social, and cultural aspects. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation provides challenges and remedies for managing discrepancies between prerequisites for an effective innovation and demands of daily implementation practice. The main recommendations are (a) standardized, simplified guidelines; (b) stepwise implementation; (c) formalized coalitions, integration of policy, and synchronization of tasks and protocols; and (d) smart planning and control by clear communication and feedback instruments. If these recommendations are incorporated into the JUMP-in intervention and organization, increased effectiveness and long-term effects can be expected.
Keywords:
implementation; process evaluation; school-based intervention; youth physical activity
Authors: Lorraine B Robbins; Jiying Ling; Ebru Kilicarslan Toruner; Kelly A Bourne; Karin A Pfeiffer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Maartje M van Stralen; Judith de Meij; Saskia J Te Velde; Marcel F van der Wal; Willem van Mechelen; Dirk L Knol; Mai Jm Chinapaw Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Russell L Carson; Ann Pulling Kuhn; Justin B Moore; Darla M Castelli; Aaron Beighle; Katie L Hodgin; Brian Dauenhauer Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2020-05-05
Authors: Samuel Cassar; Jo Salmon; Anna Timperio; Patti-Jean Naylor; Femke van Nassau; Ana María Contardo Ayala; Harriet Koorts Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 6.457