Literature DB >> 23190496

A mixed methods process evaluation of the implementation of JUMP-in, a multilevel school-based intervention aimed at physical activity promotion.

Judith S B de Meij1, Marcel F van der Wal, Willem van Mechelen, Mai J M Chinapaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate factors influencing the adoption, implementation, and institutionalization process of JUMP-in-a multilevel school-based physical activity promotion program-to optimize the dissemination of the intervention and improve its effectiveness. The process evaluation concerned the constraints and success and failure factors at sociopolitical, organizational, user, and intervention levels.
METHODS: A mixed methods approach including qualitative and quantitative data was conducted during two school years (2006-2008).
RESULTS: JUMP-in was successfully embedded in the Amsterdam municipal policy and in the organizational structure and daily practices of the sectors involved. A general impeding factor was the complexity of the multilevel programme requiring multidisciplinary collaboration between organizations. In addition, there was a discrepancy between the recommendation to standardize and simplify the innovation and the need to tailor the strategies to local environmental, social, and cultural aspects.
CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation provides challenges and remedies for managing discrepancies between prerequisites for an effective innovation and demands of daily implementation practice. The main recommendations are (a) standardized, simplified guidelines; (b) stepwise implementation; (c) formalized coalitions, integration of policy, and synchronization of tasks and protocols; and (d) smart planning and control by clear communication and feedback instruments. If these recommendations are incorporated into the JUMP-in intervention and organization, increased effectiveness and long-term effects can be expected.

Keywords:  implementation; process evaluation; school-based intervention; youth physical activity

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23190496     DOI: 10.1177/1524839912465750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  11 in total

Review 1.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Hilary Caldwell; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-23

2.  Examining reach, dose, and fidelity of the "Girls on the Move" after-school physical activity club: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Lorraine B Robbins; Jiying Ling; Ebru Kilicarslan Toruner; Kelly A Bourne; Karin A Pfeiffer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Are school-based physical activity interventions effective and equitable? A meta-analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with accelerometer-assessed activity.

Authors:  Rebecca Love; Jean Adams; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 4.  Barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainment of health behaviour interventions in schools and childcare services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adam Shoesmith; Alix Hall; Luke Wolfenden; Rachel C Shelton; Byron J Powell; Hannah Brown; Sam McCrabb; Rachel Sutherland; Serene Yoong; Cassandra Lane; Debbie Booth; Nicole Nathan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Mediators of the effect of the JUMP-in intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior in Dutch primary schoolchildren from disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Authors:  Maartje M van Stralen; Judith de Meij; Saskia J Te Velde; Marcel F van der Wal; Willem van Mechelen; Dirk L Knol; Mai Jm Chinapaw
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Promoting physical activity with a school-based dance mat exergaming intervention: qualitative findings from a natural experiment.

Authors:  Duika Burges Watson; Jean Adams; Liane B Azevedo; Catherine Haighton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Pathways for scaling up public health interventions.

Authors:  Devon Indig; Karen Lee; Anne Grunseit; Andrew Milat; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Measuring implementation fidelity of school-based obesity prevention programmes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosanne Schaap; Kathelijne Bessems; René Otten; Stef Kremers; Femke van Nassau
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Implementation evaluation of a professional development program for comprehensive school physical activity leaders.

Authors:  Russell L Carson; Ann Pulling Kuhn; Justin B Moore; Darla M Castelli; Aaron Beighle; Katie L Hodgin; Brian Dauenhauer
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-05-05

10.  Adoption, implementation and sustainability of school-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in real-world settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Cassar; Jo Salmon; Anna Timperio; Patti-Jean Naylor; Femke van Nassau; Ana María Contardo Ayala; Harriet Koorts
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.