Literature DB >> 23190181

Osseointegration of dental implants in extraction sockets preserved with porous titanium granules - an experimental study.

Anders Verket1, Ståle P Lyngstadaas, Hans J Rønold, Johan C Wohlfahrt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated osseointegration of dental implants inserted in healed extraction sockets preserved with porous titanium granules (PTG).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three adult female minipigs (Gøttingen minipig; Ellegaard A/S, Dalmose, Denmark) had the mandibular teeth P2, P3 and P4 extracted. The extraction sockets were preserved with metallic PTG (Tigran PTG; Tigran Technologies AB, Malmö, Sweden) n = 12, heat oxidized white porous titanium granules (WPTG) (Tigran PTG White) n = 12 or left empty (sham) n = 6. All sites were covered with collagen membranes (Bio-Gide; Geistlich Pharma, Wolhausen, Switzerland) and allowed 11 weeks of healing before implants (Straumann Bone Level; Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) were inserted. The temperature was measured during preparation of the osteotomies. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA, Osstell; Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) was performed at implant insertion and at termination. After 6 weeks of submerged implant healing, the pigs were euthanized and jaw segments were excised for microCT and histological analyses.
RESULTS: In the temperature and RFA analyses no significant differences were recorded between the test groups. The microCT analysis demonstrated an average bone volume of 61.7% for the PTG group compared to 50.3% for the WPTG group (P = 0.03) and 57.1% for the sham group. Histomorphometry demonstrated an average bone-to-implant contact of 68.2% for the PTG group compared to 36.6% for the WPTG group and 60.9% for the sham group (n.s). Eight out of ten implants demonstrated apical osseous defects in the WPTG group, but similar defects were observed in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: PTG preserved extraction sockets demonstrate a similar outcome as the sham control group for all analyses suggesting that this material potentially can be used for extraction socket preservation prior to implant installment. Apical osseous defects were however observed in all groups including the sham group, and a single cause could not be determined.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal experiments; biomaterials; bone implant interactions; bone substitutes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23190181     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  4 in total

1.  Porous Titanium Granules in comparison with Autogenous Bone Graft in Femoral Osseous Defects: A Histomorphometric Study of Bone Regeneration and Osseointegration in Rabbits.

Authors:  Eudoxie Pepelassi; Despina Perrea; Ismene Dontas; Christian Ulm; Ioannis Vrotsos; Stefan Tangl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The minipig intraoral dental implant model: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marta Liliana Musskopf; Amanda Finger Stadler; Ulf Me Wikesjö; Cristiano Susin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Porous titanium granules in critical size defects of rabbit tibia with or without membranes.

Authors:  Rafael Arcesio Delgado-Ruiz; Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado; Marcus Abboud; Maria Piedad Ramirez-Fernández; Jose Eduardo Maté-Sánchez; Bruno Negri; Alex Won; Georgios Romanos
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.344

4.  Vertical bone augmentation with titanium granule blocks in rabbit calvaria.

Authors:  Peter Abrahamsson; Dan-Åke Wälivaara; Jonas Anderud; Ryo Jimbo
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2017-07-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.