Literature DB >> 23190016

Incidence and predictors of radial artery spasm at the beginning of a transradial coronary procedure.

Sevket Gorgulu1, Tugrul Norgaz, Tansu Karaahmet, Sinan Dagdelen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to establish the frequency of radial artery spasm (RAS) and its predictors at the beginning of a transradial approach (TRA).
METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study. A total of 1,722 consecutive patients undergoing their first transradial coronary procedure were recruited. After radial artery puncture, a hydrophilic sheath was used to complete arterial puncture, then 500 μg glycerol trinitrate and 2.5 mg verapamil were injected into radial artery along the sheath. After retrograde radial arteriography spasm was defined angiographically as a stenosis greater than 25%. Patient demographics, procedural data such as total procedural duration, the number of catheters and guidewires used, the amount of contrast media usage, dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time, and vascular complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The overall spasm incidence was 10.3%. The procedural success rate was lower in patients with spasm than in patients without spasm (80% vs. 95.7%, P < 0.001). The patients with spasm were older (mean age 63.9 ± 9.4 years vs. 60.0 ± 11.2 years, P < 0.001) and more commonly female (51.3% vs. 34.4%, P < 0.001). Spasm was more common in hypertensive patients (66% vs. 56%, P < 0.009). Surprisingly, smoking was less common in patients with spasm (17% vs. 29%, P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that female gender (OR = 1,524, 95% CI: 1.033-2.248, P = 0.034) was the only independent predictor of RAS at the beginning of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RAS was 10,3%, and female gender was the sole independent predictor of RAS at the very beginning of the procedure in patients undergoing a TRA. ©2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23190016     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.

Authors:  Piotr Iwachow; Izabela Miechowicz; Piotr Kałmucki; Beata Dziki; Andrzej Szyszka; Artur Baszko; Tomasz Siminiak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Extremity Dysfunction After Large-Bore Radial and Femoral Arterial Access.

Authors:  Thomas A Meijers; Adel Aminian; Marleen van Wely; Koen Teeuwen; Thomas Schmitz; Maurits T Dirksen; Sudhir Rathore; René J van der Schaaf; Paul Knaapen; Joseph Dens; Juan F Iglesias; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Vincent Roolvink; Miguel E Lemmert; Renicus S Hermanides; Niels van Royen; Maarten A H van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Impact of One-Catheter Strategy with TIG I Catheter on Coronary Catheterization Performance and Economic Costs.

Authors:  Joan Costa-Mateu; Diego Fernández-Rodríguez; Kristian Rivera; Juan Casanova; Patricia Irigaray; Marta Zielonka; Eduardo Pereyra-Acha; Albina Aldomá; Fernando Worner
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Heme Effects in Lowering Patient Discomfort in Radial Artery Verapamil Injection.

Authors:  James Livesay; Raj Baljepally; Hassan Tahir; Robert Heidel
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2021-09-09

5.  Balloon-Assisted Tracking to Overcome Radial Spasm during Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Case Report.

Authors:  N J W Verouden; F Kiemeneij
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-08

6.  Efficacy and safety of a 260-cm Amplatz Super Stiff guidewire during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Xuguang Feng; Xiaoyun Zhang; Jun Dai; Jianping Bin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.