Literature DB >> 23189314

All-on-three delayed implant loading concept for the completely edentulous maxilla and mandible: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study.

Josep Oliva1, Xavi Oliva, Josep D Oliva.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Full-arch implant rehabilitation with four implants has become an accepted modality of treatment for fixed restorations in totally edentulous mandibles or maxillas; however, there is little scientific evidence on the outcome for the same treatment with three implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a protocol for three implants (all-on-three) supporting a delayed loaded fixed prosthesis in the completely edentulous maxilla, mandible, or both.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective clinical study included 17 patients with 72 implants to restore 24 fully edentulous arches. The implants were loaded 4 months after surgery with fixed zirconia prostheses. A 5-year follow-up was performed.
RESULTS: No implants were lost, giving a 100% success rate. The marginal bone loss was, on average, 0.53 mm (SD, 0.32 mm) for the internal connection implants and 0.84 mm (SD, 0.62 mm) for the external connection implants.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this small group clinical study, the high survival rate of the all-on-three protocol with delayed loading may be a viable concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23189314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Mechanical analysis of prosthetic bars and dental implants in 3 and 4 implant-supported overdenture protocols using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Luiz Bassi-Junior; Rafael Oliveira de Souza Silva; Victor Hugo Dias Dos Santos; Abner da Rocha Lourenço; Paulo Vinicius Trevizoli; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz; Vilmar Divanir Gottardo
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-05-15

Review 2.  The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Hirani; Maria Devine; Olamide Obisesan; Cathy Bryant
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 3.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

4.  Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series.

Authors:  Joao Carames; Loana Tovar Suinaga; Yung Cheng Paul Yu; Alejandro Pérez; Mary Kang
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 5.  A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants.

Authors:  Dena Hashim; Norbert Cionca; Delphine S Courvoisier; Andrea Mombelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Ibrahim; Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.