Alan S Herford1, Mei Lu, Lee Akin, Marco Cicciù. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. aherford@llu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to compare three different techniques for soft tissue closure over intraoral particulated bone grafts in a pig model: primary closure and nonprimary closure utilizing a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft), with or without the addition of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). An additional aim was to determine whether the addition of PDGF to the collagen matrix would prevent the need for primary closure or later soft tissue grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four bilateral mandibular alveolar defects were created in 12 minipigs. These defects were reconstructed with a mixture of autogenous bone and bovine bone and secured with a titanium mesh. The animals were randomly assigned to group A (Mucograft+PDGF), group B (Mucograft alone), or group C (primary closure and no Mucograft). In groups A and B the collagen matrix was placed directly over the mesh, and the soft tissue was closed passively. Exposure of the titanium mesh, height of new bone, and the percentage of keratinized mucosa covering the bone graft were analyzed. RESULTS: Average new bone formation in group A was 7.0 mm, whereas groups B and C had less regenerated bone (4.7 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively). Group A had the thickest keratinized mucosa (1.6 mm), versus 0.9 mm for group B and 0.4 mm for group C. Group A had an average of 95% regenerated keratinized tissue, whereas group B had 41% and group B had 22%. CONCLUSION: The addition of PDGF to the collagen matrix appeared to accelerate soft tissue healing and promote bone formation. Mucograft provided an adequate alternative to autogenous soft tissue grafts or primary closure to cover bone grafts intraorally while eliminating adverse effects, namely disruption of the adjacent soft tissue architecture, loss of vestibular height, and the need for further surgery.
PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to compare three different techniques for soft tissue closure over intraoral particulated bone grafts in a pig model: primary closure and nonprimary closure utilizing a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft), with or without the addition of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). An additional aim was to determine whether the addition of PDGF to the collagen matrix would prevent the need for primary closure or later soft tissue grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four bilateral mandibular alveolar defects were created in 12 minipigs. These defects were reconstructed with a mixture of autogenous bone and bovine bone and secured with a titanium mesh. The animals were randomly assigned to group A (Mucograft+PDGF), group B (Mucograft alone), or group C (primary closure and no Mucograft). In groups A and B the collagen matrix was placed directly over the mesh, and the soft tissue was closed passively. Exposure of the titanium mesh, height of new bone, and the percentage of keratinized mucosa covering the bone graft were analyzed. RESULTS: Average new bone formation in group A was 7.0 mm, whereas groups B and C had less regenerated bone (4.7 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively). Group A had the thickest keratinized mucosa (1.6 mm), versus 0.9 mm for group B and 0.4 mm for group C. Group A had an average of 95% regenerated keratinized tissue, whereas group B had 41% and group B had 22%. CONCLUSION: The addition of PDGF to the collagen matrix appeared to accelerate soft tissue healing and promote bone formation. Mucograft provided an adequate alternative to autogenous soft tissue grafts or primary closure to cover bone grafts intraorally while eliminating adverse effects, namely disruption of the adjacent soft tissue architecture, loss of vestibular height, and the need for further surgery.
Authors: Hermann Agis; Amy Collins; Andrei D Taut; Qiming Jin; Laura Kruger; Christoph Görlach; William V Giannobile Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Odeta Petrauskaite; Pedro de Sousa Gomes; Maria Helena Fernandes; Gintaras Juodzbalys; Arturas Stumbras; Julius Maminskas; Jolanta Liesiene; Marco Cicciù Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Esra Baltacıoğlu; Fatih Mehmet Korkmaz; Nilsun Bağış; Güven Aydın; Pınar Yuva; Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz; Bora Bağış Journal: Open Dent J Date: 2014-11-28
Authors: Carlo Maiorana; Mario Beretta; Davide Rancitelli; Giovanni Battista Grossi; Marco Cicciù; Alan Scott Herford Journal: Case Rep Dent Date: 2016-02-23
Authors: Marco Cicciù; Gabriele Cervino; Alan Scott Herford; Fausto Famà; Ennio Bramanti; Luca Fiorillo; Floriana Lauritano; Sergio Sambataro; Giuseppe Troiano; Luigi Laino Journal: Mar Drugs Date: 2018-01-13 Impact factor: 5.118
Authors: Daniel N Bracey; Thorsten M Seyler; Alexander H Jinnah; Mark O Lively; Jeffrey S Willey; Thomas L Smith; Mark E Van Dyke; Patrick W Whitlock Journal: J Funct Biomater Date: 2018-07-12