| Literature DB >> 23189061 |
Jianhua Li1, Zhaohui Gao, Jian Lu, Jihong Xing.
Abstract
It is known that muscle temperature (T(m)) increases with exercise. The purpose of this study was to examine if contraction-induced increase in T(m) was altered in rats with heart failure (HF) induced by chronic myocardial infraction (MI) as compared with healthy control animals. A temperature probe was inserted in the triceps surae muscle to continuously measure T(m) throughout experiments. Static muscle contraction was induced by electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve for 1 min. As baseline T(m) was 34°C, contraction increased temperature by 1.6 ± 0.18°C in nine health control rats and by 1.0 ± 0.15°C in 10 MI rats (P < 0.05 vs. control). Note that there were no differences in developed muscle tension and muscle weight between the two groups. In addition, muscle contraction increased mean arterial pressure by 23 ± 3 mmHg in control rats and by 31 ± 3 mmHg in MI rats (P < 0.05 vs. control). A regression analysis further shows that there is an inverse liner relationship between the pressor response and static contraction-induced increase in T(m). Our data suggest that T(m) increase evoked by contraction is impaired in MI rats. The abnormal alteration in T(m) likely modifies the reflex cardiovascular responses in MI via mechanisms of temperature-sensitive receptors on muscle afferent nerves.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; exercise; heart failure; muscle temperature; sympathetic nervous system
Year: 2012 PMID: 23189061 PMCID: PMC3505840 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Echocardiographic and cardiac characteristics.
| LVAW (cm) | LVDD (cm) | LVPW (cm) | LVSD (cm) | FS (%) | Heart weight (g) | LVEDP (mmHg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 55.32 ± 2.14 | 1.42 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.18 |
| HF ( | 0.08 ± 0.00* | 1.09 ± 0.02* | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.02* | 19.74 ± 1.33* | 1.79 ± 0.04* | 15 ± 3.00* |
LVAW, the thickness of left ventricular anterior wall; LVDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall; LVSD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; FS, shortening fraction of LV; LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure. Values are mean ± SE. *indicates, .
Muscle characteristics.
| Number of rats | Body weight(BW, g) | Muscle weight (MW, g) | MW/BW (mg/g) | Basal body temperature (°C) | Basal muscle temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 9 | 535 ± 19.4 | 3.69 ± 0.081 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 36.83 ± 0.20 | 34.50 ± 0.16 |
| HF | 10 | 515 ± 9.28 | 3.67 ± 0.078 | 7.1 ± 0.1 | 36.99 ± 0.14 | 34.43 ± 0.11 |
Muscle indicates the triceps surae muscle. Values are mean ± SE. There are no differences in all parameters between the two groups.
Figure 1Contraction-induced increase in muscle temperature (. The peak temperature changes in the muscle during static contraction at three levels of basal Tm are shown in (D). Values are means ± SE (Control: 9 rats; MI: 10 rats). The increases in Tm during contraction were significantly lower in MI at baseline Tm of 30, 34°C. *P < 0.05, compared with healthy control group.
Baseline MAP (mm Hg) and HR (beats/min), and peak responses.
| Baseline | Groups | Baseline MAP | Peak MAP | Baseline HR | Peak HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30°C | Control | 80 ± 3 | 99 ± 4* | 390 ± 13 | 410 ± 13 |
| HF | 84 ± 5 | 119 ± 6* | 399 ± 16 | 423 ± 17 | |
| 34°C | Control | 94 ± 6 | 117 ± 7* | 390 ± 23 | 414 ± 25 |
| HF | 93 ± 6 | 124 ± 7* | 418 ± 20 | 443 ± 20 | |
| 38°C | Control | 88 ± 7 | 109 ± 11* | 400 ± 16 | 406 ± 17 |
| HF | 94 ± 6 | 114 ± 8* | 422 ± 20 | 432 ± 24 |
Values are means ± SE. The number of animals = 9 in control; and 10 in HF. MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; .
Figure 2Peak pressor response and developed muscle tension evoked by sciatic nerve stimulation at three different basal . (A) MAP responses were significantly augmented during static muscle contraction in MI group at baseline Tm of 30 and 34°C. (B) Developed tensions are indicated by time-tension index (TTI), and the TTI induced by static contraction were similar in two groups. *P < 0.05, compared with healthy control group. The number of rats = 9 in control; and 10 in MI.
Figure 3Regression analyses between MAP response and muscle temperature change during static contraction at baseline . Note that a higher MAP response was seen as a lower Tm was induced by muscle contraction.