Literature DB >> 23188168

Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach.

Simone L Broer1, Jeroen van Disseldorp, Kimiko A Broeze, Madeleine Dolleman, Brent C Opmeer, Patrick Bossuyt, Marinus J C Eijkemans, Ben-Willem J Mol, Frank J M Broekmans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although ovarian reserve tests (ORTs) are frequently used prior to IVF treatment for outcome prediction, their added predictive value is unclear. We assessed the added value of ORTs to patient characteristics in the prediction of IVF outcome. METHODS An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis from published studies was performed. Studies on FSH, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) or antral follicle count (AFC) in women undergoing IVF were identified and authors were contacted. Using random intercept logistic regression models, we estimated the added predictive value of ORTs for poor response and ongoing pregnancy after IVF, relative to patient characteristics. RESULTS We were able to collect 28 study databases, comprising 5705 women undergoing IVF. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for female age in predicting poor response was 0.61. AFC and AMH each significantly improved the model fit (P-value <0.001). Moreover, almost a similar accuracy was reached using AMH or AFC alone (AUC 0.78 and 0.76, respectively). Combining the two tests, however, did not improve prediction (AUC 0.80, P = 0.19) of poor response. In predicting ongoing pregnancy after IVF, age was the best single predictor (AUC 0.57), and none of the ORTs added any value. CONCLUSIONS This IPD meta-analysis demonstrates that AFC and AMH clearly add to age in predicting poor response. As single tests, AFC and AMH both fully cover the prediction of poor ovarian response. In contrast, none of the ORTs add any information to the limited capacity of female age to predict ongoing pregnancy after IVF. The clinical usefulness of ORTs prior to IVF will be limited to the prediction of ovarian response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23188168     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  94 in total

1.  Dietary patterns and ovarian reserve among women attending a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Irene Souter; Audrey J Gaskins; Mariel Arvizu; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing continuation of assisted reproductive technology with conversion to intrauterine insemination in patients with low follicle numbers.

Authors:  Bo Yu; Sunni Mumford; G Donald Royster; James Segars; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Ovarian biomarkers predict controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation treatment in Singapore.

Authors:  Ryan Wai Kheong Lee; Lay Wai Khin; Marianne Sybille Hendricks; Heng Hao Tan; Sadhana Nadarajah; Nancy Wen Sim Tee; Seong-Feei Loh; Bee Choo Tai; Jerry Ky Chan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Fertility preservation in women with malignancies: the accuracy of antral follicle count collected randomly during the menstrual cycle in predicting the number of oocytes retrieved.

Authors:  Francesca Filippi; Fabio Martinelli; Alessio Paffoni; Marco Reschini; Francesco Raspagliesi; Edgardo Somigliana
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Perceived infertility and contraceptive use in the female, reproductive-age cancer survivor.

Authors:  Tracy N Hadnott; Shaylyn S Stark; Alexa Medica; Andrew C Dietz; Maria Elena Martinez; Brian W Whitcomb; H Irene Su
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Mehmet Erdem; Ahmet Erdem; Sule Yildiz; Ilknur Mutlu; Ozgur Arisoy; Mesut Oktem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Do young women with unexplained infertility show manifestations of decreased ovarian reserve?

Authors:  Noa Abrahami; Ido Izhaki; Johnny S Younis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Follicular sensitivity index (FSI): a novel tool to predict clinical pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Authors:  AbdelGany M A Hassan; Mohamed M M Kotb; Ahmed M A AwadAllah; Nesreen A A Shehata; Amr Wahba
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  A novel mathematical model of true ovarian reserve assessment based on predicted probability of poor ovarian response: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Huiyu Xu; Guoshuang Feng; Haiyan Wang; Yong Han; Rui Yang; Ying Song; Lixue Chen; Li Shi; Meng Qian Zhang; Rong Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Luteal phase dynamics of follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones in obese and normal weight women.

Authors:  Lauren W Roth; Amanda A Allshouse; Erica L Bradshaw-Pierce; Jennifer Lesh; Justin Chosich; Wendy Kohrt; Andrew P Bradford; Alex J Polotsky; Nanette Santoro
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.478

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.