Literature DB >> 23187989

A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in children with immobilized cervical spine.

Arnim Vlatten1, Sharon Litz, Brian MacManus, Sebastian Launcelott, Chris Soder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Airway management in children with cervical spine may make direct laryngoscopy difficult. Video laryngoscopy is an alternative to direct laryngoscopy. The GlideScope video laryngoscope, successfully used in expected and unexpected difficult pediatric airway situations, has not been studied so far in children with cervical spine immobilization.
METHODS: A total of 23 children underwent laryngoscopy with manual cervical spine immobilization using the GlideScope and a direct laryngoscope (Miller 1 or Macintosh 2 blade). Percentage of glottis opening score, Cormack-Lehane score, and time to best view were recorded.
RESULTS: Percentage of glottis opening score using the GlideScope was 50% (1%-87%) and 90% (60%-100%) using direct laryngoscopy (P < 0.001). Cormack-Lehane score using the GlideScope was 1 (1-2.7) and 1 (1-1) in direct laryngoscopy (P < 0.001). Time to best view with the GlideScope was 21 seconds (12.2-28 seconds) and 7 seconds (6-8.7 seconds) in direct laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). Data are presented as median and interquartile range and analyzed using paired t test.
CONCLUSIONS: In simulated difficult pediatric airway, using the GlideScope resulted in a significantly declined view to the glottic entrance. This result is in contrast to studies in children with difficult airway anatomy due to an anterior larynx, where the GlideScope resulted in improved views.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23187989     DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182768bde

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  4 in total

1.  Pediatric difficult airway: Video laryngoscope to the rescue.

Authors:  Bhavna Hooda; Mihir Prakash Pandia
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10

2.  Comparison of Coopdech®, CoPilot®, Intubrite®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled crossover simulation trial.

Authors:  Łukasz Szarpak; Łukasz Czyżewski; Zenon Truszewski; Andrzej Kurowski; Tomasz Gaszyński
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.

Authors:  Marcin Madziala; Jacek Smereka; Marek Dabrowski; Steve Leung; Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Video Laryngoscopy Using King Vision™ aBlade™ and Direct Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Airway Management: A Randomized Controlled Study about Device Learning by Anaesthesia Residents.

Authors:  Katharina Epp; Sophie Zimmermann; Eva Wittenmeier; Marc Kriege; Frank Dette; Irene Schmidtmann; Nina Pirlich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.