Literature DB >> 23187855

Molecular-based and alternative therapies for pancreatic cancer: looking "out of the box".

Renee Tholey1, Janet A Sawicki, Jonathan R Brody.   

Abstract

The current treatment options for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma fall exceedingly short of a cure, providing a sobering 5-year survival rate of only 5% for all patients, and the disease will be responsible for more than 37,000 deaths in the United States alone this year. These numbers continue to grow, and it was recently predicted that, within decades, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma will become the second most lethal cancer in this country. Beyond conventional oncologic-based therapies, researchers are working hard, albeit with increasingly limited federal support, to develop multiple novel therapeutic options focusing primarily on targeting specific, disrupted core signaling pathways within pancreatic cancer cells. In line with the history of medical oncology and medical paradigms, many pharmaceutical companies and large academic institutions have been focused on searching for compounds (biologic and chemicals) in an effort to find that unique "magic bullet" that will extend pancreatic cancer patients' lives (e.g., K-ras inhibitors). This magic bullet has been difficult to find in a haystack full of molecular pathways and mutated genes because the challenge is defined by identifying a therapeutic window that kills the tumor, yet spares the host. This therapeutic window has been hard to discover in the backdrop of the heterogeneous cell populations that make up a pancreatic tumor together with a heterogeneous patient population that has multiple, undefined tumor subtypes. Thus, to date, efforts have had limited success. Perhaps the best recent example of limited success is the discovery of the classic combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), extending life by only 4 months when compared with gemcitabine (note that this drug combination does not directly target one single pathway or pancreatic cancer subtype).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23187855     DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182793ff6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  4 in total

1.  N-acetyl-L-cysteine sensitizes pancreatic cancers to gemcitabine by targeting the NFκB pathway.

Authors:  Suparna Qanungo; Joachim D Uys; Yefim Manevich; Anne M Distler; Brooke Shaner; Elizabeth G Hill; John J Mieyal; John J Lemasters; Danyelle M Townsend; Anna-Liisa Nieminen
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 2.  Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options.

Authors:  Jens Werner; Stephanie E Combs; Christoph Springfeld; Werner Hartwig; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Altered sphingolipid metabolism in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yixing Jiang; Nicole A DiVittore; Megan M Young; Zhiliang Jia; Keping Xie; Timothy M Ritty; Mark Kester; Todd E Fox
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2013-07-25

4.  Oridonin enhances the anti-tumor activity of gemcitabine towards pancreatic cancer by stimulating Bax- and Smac-dependent apoptosis.

Authors:  Dian-Lei Liu; He-Qi Bu; Wen-Long Wang; Hua Luo; Bo-Ning Cheng
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.