Literature DB >> 23187840

Current staging systems for pancreatic cancer.

Betsy L Appel1, Parag Tolat, Douglas B Evans, Susan Tsai.   

Abstract

Accurate pretreatment staging of pancreatic cancer is a crucial initial step in the development of a stage-specific treatment plan, either on- or off-protocol for any patient with pancreatic cancer. Importantly, current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging utilizes the maximal information available; if surgery has been performed, then pathological information from the resected specimen will provide additional information for both T and N staging. If surgery has not been performed, then staging is based on information from available cross-sectional imaging studies. Although American Joint Committee on Cancer staging was modified in the sixth edition to reflect the survival difference between patients with operable/resectable versus nonoperable/unresectable disease, the precise definitions of resectability continue to evolve. It is essential for clinicians of different specialties to understand the definitions of resectability to facilitate optimal patient care and to allow for accurate interpretation of the literature. This review focuses on important aspects of the pretreatment assessment of patients with particular attention to definitions of resectability. Computed tomography has become the optimal imaging modality for pancreatic cancer staging, but other adjunct studies, including endoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopy, may provide additional staging information especially in circumstances where computed tomography technology is limited. In addition, the process of a standardized pathological review is summarized, with emphasis on assessment of the superior mesenteric artery margin and the definitions of R0, R1, and R2. Finally, the prognostic importance of key components of the pathological report such as lymph node status, lymph node ratio, and treatment effect is reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23187840     DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318278c5b5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  21 in total

1.  Feasibility and reliability of pancreatic cancer staging using a new confocal non-fluorescent microscopy probe: a double-blind study in rats.

Authors:  Cherif Akladios; Vivian De Ruijter; Sylvana Perretta; Marc Aprahamian; Mihaela Ignat; Veronique Lindner; Gerlinde Averous; Bernard Dallemagne; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Radiographic tumor-vein interface as a predictor of intraoperative, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hop S Tran Cao; Alpana Balachandran; Huamin Wang; Graciela M Nogueras-González; Christina E Bailey; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans; Gauri Varadhachary; Christopher H Crane; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Patency rates of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein reconstruction after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A N Krepline; K K Christians; K Duelge; A Mahmoud; P Ritch; B George; B A Erickson; W D Foley; E J Quebbeman; K K Turaga; F M Johnston; T C Gamblin; D B Evans; S Tsai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Perioperative treatment options in resectable pancreatic cancer - how to improve long-term survival.

Authors:  Marianne Sinn; Marcus Bahra; Timm Denecke; Sue Travis; Uwe Pelzer; Hanno Riess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-03-15

5.  Is Adjuvant Therapy Necessary for All Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer Who Have Received Neoadjuvant Therapy?

Authors:  Chad A Barnes; Ashley N Krepline; Mohammed Aldakkak; Callisia N Clarke; Kathleen K Christians; Abdul H Khan; Bryan C Hunt; Paul S Ritch; Ben George; William A Hall; Beth A Erickson; Douglas B Evans; Susan Tsai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Poor Glycemic Control Is Associated with Failure to Complete Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery in Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  E S Paul Rajamanickam; K K Christians; M Aldakkak; A N Krepline; P S Ritch; B George; B A Erickson; W D Foley; M Aburajab; D B Evans; S Tsai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  HLA-G impairs host immune response and predicts poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Zhe-Yu Niu; Zhi-Yong Liang; Wei-Xun Zhou; Lei You; Meng-Yi Wang; Lu-Tian Yao; Quan Liao; Yu-Pei Zhao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

8.  Preoperative high level of D-dimers predicts unresectability of pancreatic head cancer.

Authors:  Adam Durczynski; Anna Kumor; Piotr Hogendorf; Dariusz Szymanski; Piotr Grzelak; Janusz Strzelczyk
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Surgical resection strategies for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Gluth; Jens Werner; Werner Hartwig
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Pre-treatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 does not predict the response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Mohammed Aldakkak; Kathleen K Christians; Ashley N Krepline; Ben George; Paul S Ritch; Beth A Erickson; Fabian M Johnston; Douglas B Evans; Susan Tsai
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.