Literature DB >> 23187154

A biomechanical comparison of ipsilateral and contralateral pedicle screw placement for modified triangular osteosynthesis in unstable pelvic fractures.

Paul Toogood1, Erik McDonald, Murat Pekmezci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Iliosacral fixation of unstable pelvic fractures does not produce enough stability to allow for immediate postoperative weight bearing. Triangular osteosynthesis creates additional resistance to vertical displacement and rotation. A disadvantage is the loss of the L5/S1 motion segment. We propose a modification of the standard triangular osteosynthesis construct in which the contralateral S1 pedicle is used. As the ipsilateral L5 pedicle is unavailable for fixation in a saw-bones composite pelvic model, we compared ipsilateral and contralateral S1 pedicle screw constructs. We hypothesized that ipsilateral and contralateral S1 pedicle screw constructs would demonstrate no difference in displacement or rotation.
METHODS: Seven saw bones pelvic models were tested. A 5-mm vertical fracture gap was created through the left sacrum while the pubic symphysis was completely dissociated. Each pelvis was tested sequentially in 4 triangular osteosynthesis configurations: ipsilateral S1 screw with anterior plate, contralateral S1 screw with anterior plate, contralateral S1 screw without anterior plate, and ipsilateral S1 screw without anterior plate. Specimens were cyclically loaded from 100-200 N at 0.25 Hz for 25 cycles and then loaded up to 300 N at 10 mm/min while displacement and rotation at the sacral and pubic fracture sites were measured.
RESULTS: There was no difference in any of the displacement measures between ipsilateral and contralateral constructs. When comparing rotation, the contralateral configuration experienced significantly less rotation than the ipsilateral configuration with and without the anterior plate applied.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the current model, contralateral S1 constructs for modified triangular osteosynthesis were biomechanically equal to ipsilateral constructs in preventing displacement and superior in preventing rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23187154     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182787d54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

1.  A biomechanical study of sacroiliac rod fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries: verification of the "within ring" concept.

Authors:  Kentaro Futamura; Tomonori Baba; Atsuhiko Mogami; Itaru Morohashi; Osamu Obayashi; Hideaki Iwase; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  "Within ring"-based sacroiliac rod fixation may overcome the weakness of spinopelvic fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries: technical notes and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kentaro Futamura; Tomonori Baba; Atsuhiko Mogami; Akio Kanda; Osamu Obayashi; Hideaki Iwase; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Corridor-diameter-dependent angular tolerance for safe transiliosacral screw placement: an anatomic study of 433 pelves.

Authors:  D Alex McLaren; Gennadiy A Busel; Harsh R Parikh; Arthur Only; Jason Patterson; Brandon T Gaston; Ryan McLemore; Brian Cunningham
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-01

4.  Minimally invasive triangular osteosynthesis for highly unstable sacral fractures: Technical notes and preliminary clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Shozo Kanezaki; Masashi Miyazaki; Naoki Notani; Toshinubu Ishihara; Tomonori Sakamoto; Takashi Sone; Masashi Kataoka; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Comparison of Biomechanical Performance of Five Different Treatment Approaches for Fixing Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury.

Authors:  Yongtao Lu; Yiqian He; Weiteng Li; Zhuoyue Yang; Ruifei Peng; Li Yu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.