Literature DB >> 23187057

Evaluation of living kidney donors: variables that affect donation.

Deonna R Moore1, Irene D Feurer, Victor Zaydfudim, Haley Hoy, Edward Y Zavala, David Shaffer, Heidi Schaefer, Derek E Moore.   

Abstract

Approximately 10000 deceased donor organs are available yearly for 85 000 US patients awaiting kidney transplant. Living kidney donation is essential to close this gap and offers better survival rates. However, nationally, 80% of potential donors evaluated fail to donate. Nurse coordinators who perform predonation screening and education need additional insight into the large number of potential donors who fail to complete the donation process. Reasons for nondonation in donor candidates undergoing medical evaluation, and variables affecting nondonation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between 2004 and 2009 are examined. Multivariable logistic regression models are used to test the effects of age and race on donation status and reasons for nondonation. Summary data are frequencies, percentages, and means (SD). The sample included 706 candidates (63% female, 80% white; mean age, 40 [SD, 12] years). Almost half (46%) received clearance to donate. Undiagnosed hypertension (14%), abnormal glucose tolerance (10%), and protein-urea (9%) were the most prevalent medical reasons for nondonation. About 13% of candidates changed their minds during evaluation. Analyses demonstrated an increased likelihood of older candidates (P < .001) and a decreased likelihood of white candidates (P = .007) being excluded from donation. Within the nondonation group, increased age was associated with undiagnosed hypertension and abnormal glucose tolerance (both race-adjusted, P = .01). Younger candidates (race-adjusted, P = .003) and African Americans (age-adjusted, P = .04) were more likely to decide against donation. The most prevalent medical reasons for nondonation could be identified through enhanced prescreening, and improved preevaluation education could decrease nondonation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23187057     DOI: 10.7182/pit2012570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.187


  9 in total

1.  Racial differences in completion of the living kidney donor evaluation process.

Authors:  Komal Kumar; James M Tonascia; Abimereki D Muzaale; Tanjala S Purnell; Shane E Ottmann; Fawaz Al Ammary; Mary G Bowring; Anna Poon; Elizabeth A King; Allan B Massie; Eric K H Chow; Alvin G Thomas; Hao Ying; Marvin Borja; Jonathan M Konel; Macey Henderson; Andrew M Cameron; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Living kidney donation in a developing country.

Authors:  Chandni Dayal; Malcolm Davies; Nina Elisabeth Diana; Anthony Meyers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Characteristics and Evaluation of Geographically Distant vs Geographically Nearby Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  F L Weng; D C Lee; N Dhillon; K N Tibaldi; L A Davis; A M Patel; R J Goldberg; M Morgievich; S Mulgaonkar
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Improving Efficiencies in Live Kidney Donor Evaluation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Deonna R Moore; David Serur; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; James R Rodrigue; Rebecca Hays; Matthew Cooper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  The decline in living kidney donation in the United States: random variation or cause for concern?

Authors:  James R Rodrigue; Jesse D Schold; Didier A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Population Health, Ethnicity, and Rate of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Rhiannon D Reed; Deirdre Sawinski; Brittany A Shelton; Paul A MacLennan; Michael Hanaway; Vineeta Kumar; Dustin Long; Robert S Gaston; Meredith L Kilgore; Bruce A Julian; Cora E Lewis; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Enhanced Advocacy and Health Systems Training Through Patient Navigation Increases Access to Living-donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Rhiannon D Reed; Vineeta Kumar; Beverly Berry; Daagye Hendricks; Alexis Carter; Brittany A Shelton; Margaux N Mustian; Paul A MacLennan; Haiyan Qu; Lonnie Hannon; Clayton Yates; Michael J Hanaway
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.385

8.  The Efficiency of Evaluating Candidates for Living Kidney Donation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Steven Habbous; Justin Woo; Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Matthew Cooper; Marian Reich; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-09-20

9.  Outcomes of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations in the Living Donor Collective Pilot Registry.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Yoon Son Ahn; Michael Conboy; Mary Amanda Dew; Christian Folken; Macey Levan; Ajay K Israni; Krista L Lentine; Arthur J Matas; Kenneth A Newell; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Allan B Massie; Donald Musgrove; Jon J Snyder; Sandra J Taler; Jeffrey Wang; Amy D Waterman
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-04-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.